We performed a comparison between AWS Security Hub and Trend Micro Cloud One based on our users’ reviews in five categories. After reading all of the collected data, you can find our conclusion below.
Features: AWS Security Hub is highly praised for its integration capabilities and real-time alert capabilities. On the other hand, Trend Micro Cloud One is valued for its excellent vulnerability protection, login inspection, and control over restrictions for server access and application installation. Additionally, Cloud One provides valuable visibility inside microservice architecture and between pods. AWS Security Hub has room for improvement in terms of integration options, user interface, and multi-cloud compatibility. On the other hand, Trend Micro Cloud One needs improvement in pricing, automation, setup, licensing, marketing documentation, local agent logs, alerts, and flexibility.
Service and Support: The technical support provided by AWS Security Hub was described as prompt and good, whereas Trend Micro Cloud One's support was consistently praised and rated highly. Trend Micro Cloud One was noted for having a shared support center with 100 resources deployed 24/7, and customers rated their technical support for Container Security at nine or ten out of ten.
Ease of Deployment: AWS Security Hub is easy to set up and requires minimal maintenance, while Trend Micro Cloud One's setup can be more complex and time-consuming, depending on the user's technical skills and environment. AWS Security Hub requires policy configuration, while Trend Micro Cloud One requires daily monitoring and maintenance and can take up to a month to deploy.
Pricing: AWS Security Hub has a fair and acceptable setup cost, whereas Trend Micro Cloud One's cost falls within the average range and depends on the number of units. Although Trend Micro may require additional services, its basic service offers a solid foundation for monitoring infrastructure.
ROI: AWS Security Hub seems to have a positive outcome, while Trend Micro Cloud One is praised for its flexibility and easy integration.
Comparison Results: AWS Security Hub is a better choice than Trend Micro Cloud One according to user reviews, as it has strong integration capabilities, real-time alerts, and detailed compliance alerts. Trend Micro Cloud One does have good vulnerability protection and workload management, but it is criticized for its high cost, lack of automation and robustness, and complex setup process.
"Cloudposse is a valuable feature as it guarantees my security."
"The solution shows us our compliance score."
"The best feature of AWS Security Hub is that you can get compliance or your cloud's current security posture."
"Currently, our organization utilizes AWS for various purposes, including SaaS (Software as a Service), PaaS (Platform as a Service), and hosting applications in the cloud. We develop our applications and use AWS services as a platform for basic functions and secondary development needs. Additionally, we rely on PaaS for accounting services. Approximately, 50% of our applications are hosted in the cloud environment, making it a significant part of our current setup."
"I like that AWS Security Hub currently has several good features, around four or five. The technical support for AWS Security Hub is also responsive."
"Finding out if your infrastructure is secure is a valuable feature."
"The most valuable feature of the solution stems from the fact that it is easy to manage...It is a scalable solution."
"I really like the seamless integration with the AWS account structure. It can even be made mandatory as part of the landing zone. These are great features. And there's a single pane of glass for the entire account."
"Vision One is versatile and can be integrated with many SIEMs. You're not limited to only one SIEM, such as Microsoft Sentinel. The API integrations are seamless, and we have all the documentation needed to integrate Vision One via API."
"The product helps us understand our environment better."
"The tech support is excellent. They really know their products. They also know a lot of about the integrations between different solutions."
"I really like Trend Vision One - Cloud Security's dashboard."
"The perfect package for all security platforms, providing more than any other endpoint solution."
"Virtual patching is one of the key features, which is executed with their IPS."
"It has the best EDR functionality for cloud and typical endpoints."
"Trend Vision One - Cloud Security's best features are security analysis, remote access security, and driver security."
"From an improvement perspective, there is a need to add more compliance since, right now, AWS Security Hub only provides four to five compliances to control the tool."
"Adding SIEM features would be beneficial because of the limited customization of AWS Security Hub."
"AWS Security Hub should improve the time it takes to update. It takes a long period of time when updating. It can take 24 hours sometimes to update. Additionally, when integrating this solution with more security tools, takes time."
"The solution will only give you insight if you have configure rule enabled. It should work more like Prisma Cloud and Dome9 which have a better approach."
"The support must be quicker."
"We need more granular-level customizations to enable or disable the rules in AWS Security Hub."
"Although AWS Security Hub does a periodic scan of your overall infrastructure, it doesn't do it in real time."
"The solution lacks self-sufficiency."
"The licensing model could be improved. To gain full coverage, you need to spend more to buy subscriptions for each kind of service they offer. It will start to be pricey if you want full coverage."
"The initial setup can be complex for the inexperienced."
"There are also some loopholes because it's a new product that they have recently migrated to the cloud. We do see some issues with the policies we have assigned when it comes to a particular account. There are some issues with system support, such as a particular server kernel version that is not supported."
"The dashboard should be a bit more intuitive."
"The workbook insights generate a massive list, making it inconvenient to review."
"The local agent should be able to show more logs. At present, the logs are only available from the web console and not from the local agent."
"The initial setup is easy for someone who operates container platforms on a daily basis. However, it could be difficult for those coming purely from informational security or another field of an IT."
"The firewall configuration should have been automated based on the understanding of the application, utilities, and protocols."
More Trend Vision One - Cloud Security Pricing and Cost Advice →
AWS Security Hub is ranked 13th in Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) with 17 reviews while Trend Vision One - Cloud Security is ranked 5th in Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) with 17 reviews. AWS Security Hub is rated 7.6, while Trend Vision One - Cloud Security is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of AWS Security Hub writes "A centralized dashboard that enables efficient monitoring and management of possible security issues". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Trend Vision One - Cloud Security writes "We can quickly deploy cloud conformity, provides good visibility, and control". AWS Security Hub is most compared with Microsoft Sentinel, Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks, Wiz, Microsoft Defender for Cloud and Google Chronicle Suite, whereas Trend Vision One - Cloud Security is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Cloud, AWS GuardDuty, Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration, Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks and Orca Security. See our AWS Security Hub vs. Trend Vision One - Cloud Security report.
See our list of best Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) vendors.
We monitor all Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
