Azure Container Registry vs JFrog Container Registry comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Microsoft Logo
3,750 views|2,663 comparisons
93% willing to recommend
JFrog Logo
5,379 views|5,098 comparisons
66% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Azure Container Registry and JFrog Container Registry based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Container Registry solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Azure Container Registry vs. JFrog Container Registry Report (Updated: May 2024).
772,679 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The solution allows you to isolate standard containers, which is its most valuable feature. Azure Container Registry does what it's supposed to do and gives you visibility into the Docker images, the logs, information on pulling and pushing the data, etc.""What I like best about Azure Container Registry is that it's fast. It also has 24 x 7 reliability. I didn't face any downtime issues using Azure Container Registry. I also like how secure the solution is, especially as it's from Microsoft.""It's great for storing images on containers.""Feature-wise, the security model and access controls are pretty straightforward and valuable""Provides secure duplication and the option for service webhooks.""The continuity screen is a valuable feature.""Azure Container Registry is an easy-to-install, easy-to-configure, and easy-to-deploy solution.""Pricing is reasonable."

More Azure Container Registry Pros →

"It supports multi-cloud deployments across AWS, Azure, and GCP.""We have integrated JFrog Xray, and we use it for storage purposes.""We use the solution to compile the codes before publishing them. We utilize third-party containers and codes, downloading them to the JFrog Container Registry. Developers then access it from the JFrog Container Registry, and there's a specific job responsible for running and validating all security checks, ensuring compatibility. If there are any issues or if packages require updates, we manage those updates through this system."

More JFrog Container Registry Pros →

Cons
"We have found that it is sometimes difficult to pull images from the host application.""They can improve their scalability.""The accessibility of Azure Container Registry also has room for improvement because the solution is not always accessible 24 x 7. I experienced this three times when the service wasn't responding, so I could not push or pull images, and I had to decommission Azure Container Registry and redeploy it.""It's not an open source, and we pay per hour to Microsoft Azure.""Implementation needs improvement. We have a lot of open, online sources. Doing a deployment is easy for us. The only issue is when we have VPN connections and we try to pull the images from Container images to the local Dockers, it slows down.""Lacks the option of having access keys stored in a master key vault.""The solution has become more popular in the last few years but I find that the technical support has not increased their knowledge base, so more knowledgeable support staff can help improve the solution.""The deployment is an area that needs improvement, as it can take some time to deploy."

More Azure Container Registry Cons →

"The solution's documentation available over the internet is not straightforward and customer-friendly.""In my experience, there was a bit of a learning curve at the beginning. It can be somewhat challenging to install and get started.""One challenge we face is related to performance. Our integration involves GitHab and JFrog Container Registry, with pipelines fetching data from GitHub and JFrog Container Registry for third-party code. However, there are instances where this process can slow down the pipeline."

More JFrog Container Registry Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "Azure is a bit expensive."
  • "Azure Container Registry, has no cost, but you pay for storage service."
  • "I have no information on how much Azure Container Registry costs. I know it's the only solution my institution can use, so the cost was approved."
  • "The Premium version includes some enhancements but is still quite okay with regard to pricing."
  • "When using Azure Container Registry, it was $1.5 or $1.6 per day, but I'm unsure how much it costs today."
  • "The product is competitively priced."
  • "I would rate the pricing four out of ten."
  • More Azure Container Registry Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "The solution is expensive."
  • "The pricing is somewhat expensive compared to its competitors. We use the Pro version."
  • "JFrog Container Registry is a very expensive solution."
  • More JFrog Container Registry Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Container Registry solutions are best for your needs.
    772,679 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:Azure Container Registry is an easy-to-install, easy-to-configure, and easy-to-deploy solution.
    Top Answer:We have a one-year or two-year contract. We can extend it to a ten-year contract because it is a stable application. We have our images ready, with which we want to focus on the customer. We are using… more »
    Top Answer:The solution could provide more integration.
    Top Answer:It supports multi-cloud deployments across AWS, Azure, and GCP.
    Top Answer:JFrog Container Registry is a very expensive solution. On a scale from one to ten, where one is expensive and ten is cheap, I rate the solution’s pricing a two out of ten.
    Top Answer:The solution's documentation available over the internet is not straightforward and customer-friendly. The documentation is mostly for the on-prem services, and there's no documentation for the cloud… more »
    Ranking
    3rd
    out of 13 in Container Registry
    Views
    3,750
    Comparisons
    2,663
    Reviews
    12
    Average Words per Review
    540
    Rating
    8.1
    4th
    out of 13 in Container Registry
    Views
    5,379
    Comparisons
    5,098
    Reviews
    3
    Average Words per Review
    466
    Rating
    7.3
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Microsoft Azure Container Registry
    Learn More
    Overview

    Azure Container Registry allows you to build, store, and manage container images and artifacts in a private registry for all types of container deployments. Use Azure container registries with your existing container development and deployment pipelines. Use Azure Container Registry Tasks to build container images in Azure on-demand, or automate builds triggered by source code updates, updates to a container's base image, or timers.

    The JFrog Container Registry is a repository manager, which supports Docker and Helm registries and Generic repositories, allowing you to build, deploy and manage your container images while providing powerful features with fine-grained permission control behind a sleek and easy-to-use UI.

    Sample Customers
    DNV GL, Alaska Airlines, Finastra
    Facebook, Airbus, Dell, Slack, Volvo, Netflix, Spotify, T-Systems, Mastercard
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company16%
    Financial Services Firm16%
    Manufacturing Company6%
    Government6%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company16%
    Financial Services Firm15%
    Manufacturing Company11%
    Insurance Company5%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business25%
    Midsize Enterprise25%
    Large Enterprise50%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business18%
    Midsize Enterprise12%
    Large Enterprise70%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business16%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise71%
    Buyer's Guide
    Azure Container Registry vs. JFrog Container Registry
    May 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Azure Container Registry vs. JFrog Container Registry and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.
    772,679 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Azure Container Registry is ranked 3rd in Container Registry with 16 reviews while JFrog Container Registry is ranked 4th in Container Registry with 3 reviews. Azure Container Registry is rated 8.2, while JFrog Container Registry is rated 7.4. The top reviewer of Azure Container Registry writes "Configurations are quite simple with tokens that set folder structure or access levels". On the other hand, the top reviewer of JFrog Container Registry writes "Self-hosted and works well in hybrid SaaS environments and automation is fast without any breakdowns". Azure Container Registry is most compared with Amazon ECR, Harbor, Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) and Red Hat Quay, whereas JFrog Container Registry is most compared with Harbor, Amazon ECR, Red Hat Quay and VMware Harbor Registry. See our Azure Container Registry vs. JFrog Container Registry report.

    See our list of best Container Registry vendors.

    We monitor all Container Registry reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.