We performed a comparison between Azure Container Registry and Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Container Registry solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable feature is that it's easy to download, install and manage."
"The solution has built-in resiliency and replication zone availability so it is very stable."
"The portability and elasticity features are the most valuable."
"It's great for storing images on containers."
"The solution allows you to isolate standard containers, which is its most valuable feature. Azure Container Registry does what it's supposed to do and gives you visibility into the Docker images, the logs, information on pulling and pushing the data, etc."
"Specific tokens can be used to set folder structure or restrict things like read or write access."
"One of the benefits of this solution is that it's private and secure."
"The continuity screen is a valuable feature."
"I have found Oracle Cloud to be a scalable solution."
"The product is scalable."
"Overall, there are some very good features on Oracle and it offers good customization capabilities."
"You can customize everything according to your preferences. I've reached out to customer support many times. I highly recommend using Oracle Cloud Infrastructure. With the product, you have complete control over the management of your system."
"The most valuable feature of Oracle Cloud is its autonomous database."
"Frankly speaking, I've been very impressed with the stability the solution offers. Everything is working very well at the moment, and we haven't had any issues or faced any bugs or glitches."
"The product helps us to use it as a central ERP and HCM."
"The main benefit is that you're getting all of the resources you require on a subscription base. So, you get to pay as you go instead of having to have a CAPEX, you convert your CAPEX to OPEX to cover the data center cost."
"Lacks the option of having access keys stored in a master key vault."
"The solution has become more popular in the last few years but I find that the technical support has not increased their knowledge base, so more knowledgeable support staff can help improve the solution."
"The solution could always improve its security measures with regard to access."
"We have found that it is sometimes difficult to pull images from the host application."
"The deployment is an area that needs improvement, as it can take some time to deploy."
"The setup process is mildly complex. There is no straightforward management platform, so there's a level of complexity to it."
"Implementation needs improvement. We have a lot of open, online sources. Doing a deployment is easy for us. The only issue is when we have VPN connections and we try to pull the images from Container images to the local Dockers, it slows down."
"They can improve their scalability."
"Technical support could be more responsive."
"The solution's scalability is an area with shortcomings...Mid-level customers feel that Oracle is not scalable in their environment and is an enterprise-level segment solution."
"The packaging part of the software needs improvement. It lacks customization abilities for users. Giving them VMs for machine learning or running their own programs like Azure and Amazon, for example. Things like scalability based on the requirement of the tools. Oracle still lacks these kinds of things. For example, if you need a VM from Oracle, you need to pay for a monthly fee. They started developing containership but it's still at the initial stage and it's still lacking. They also need to develop integration between packages."
"Amazon AWS has a better solution overall."
"Nowadays, every SR is referred to Oracle Cloud Connect without a person actually handling the customer."
"Pricing could be improved considering competition and market conditions."
"The pricing is a bit expensive."
"The functionalities could be simplified as it is a bit difficult to learn."
More Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) Pricing and Cost Advice →
Azure Container Registry is ranked 3rd in Container Registry with 16 reviews while Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) is ranked 5th in Container Registry with 91 reviews. Azure Container Registry is rated 8.2, while Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Azure Container Registry writes "Configurations are quite simple with tokens that set folder structure or access levels". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) writes "Cost-effective and can be used to host OIC and APEX". Azure Container Registry is most compared with Amazon ECR, JFrog Container Registry, Harbor and Red Hat Quay, whereas Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) is most compared with Microsoft Azure, Amazon AWS, Google Cloud, IBM Public Cloud and Pivotal Cloud Foundry. See our Azure Container Registry vs. Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) report.
See our list of best Container Registry vendors.
We monitor all Container Registry reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.