We performed a comparison between BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management and CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Privileged Access Management (PAM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It scales easily and the product is stable."
"The tool is easy to use and deploy. It has PAM capabilities like privilege access. The solution helps with the management of third parties and vendors. It is an effective solution compared to other alternatives."
"The privileged access and the application control are helpful in making sure we have good, robust challenge responses. Blacklisting with trusted application protection is also beneficial for us."
"I'm a BeyondTrust partner and I have multiple deployments, four or five banks right now. The features that give us quite an edge compared to what our competitors are offering - like IBM or Thycotic - are the Session Management, that is quite a big one; also the recording of keystrokes. In addition, there is the password vaulting and state-of-the-art Password Management, which I haven't seen in other products."
"Technical support is good."
"The implementation is quite easy because the documents are always online."
"Logs that get collected on the Privilege Management console from the agents are very good. They help us to identify the aspects from which we have to whitelist an application."
"The features related to application elevate is amazing. It helped the company to remove almost all admin local users."
"The solution's technical support is good."
"The product is very flexible"
"The most valuable feature is that their database is completely encrypted and protected with multiple layers."
"The product is stable."
"CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager (EPM) 's most valuable feature is its ability to manage user application privileges and protect against ransomware attacks by controlling access to specific files and applications."
"The most valuable feature of CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is its high performance, it's the best identity security platform. The security is good. It's easy to showcase the feature and capabilities and compare it with other competitors. It competes well with other solutions. Additionally, it is a complete solution."
"It offers great performance."
"The password rotation and the session recording are the most valuable features."
"A valuable enhancement could be the capability to deploy agents directly through the console."
"The program updates are very rare and the frequency is too far apart to take care of bug fixes and adding the latest features."
"It keeps on breaking every now and then. It is not yet mature. Every time something new comes up or we run into some new issues, the culprit is BeyondTrust because the agents and the adapter are not mature. The new development process goes on, and they're not able to handle things. It should be mature. It shouldn't break every now and then."
"The initial setup was very difficult. Even if you are an expert in EPM, it is still very difficult."
"They are doing good for now, but they should start to consider tight integration with Mac solutions. There should be more integration with Mac. There should be Active Directory (AD) Bridging. Thycotic and Centrify have it currently because they merged and joined forces, and it was a feature available in Centrify. So, basically, they joined forces to create a kind of perfect product. If you have a hybrid or mixed environment with Windows and Mac, your Active Directory can only manage or enforce policies on Windows, but what about your Mac devices? How do you control them? So, AD Bridging will act as a bridge to bring all your Mac devices into your Active Directory. This way you have full control over your entire environment."
"It should support XWindows Remote Desktop Access protocol for Linux/Unix."
"There is room for improvement in having the solution align more with standards. We're always shoehorning the product into the standards. It's not that it doesn't work for standards, it does. But Quick Start Policies are pretty close to what we need. The vendor needs to keep looking at GDPR, 27001, and 27701. That's why our clients buy the product."
"There are three types of endpoints. If we need to use them in the solution, then we need to purchase the licenses separately. The tool needs to improve its licensing."
"The price of the product is an area of concern where improvements are required. The product's price should be made more flexible."
"Technical support is slow to respond when we run into issues."
"Can be improved by allowing computers to be excluded from policies."
"We have had some major issues with the tool, but we have worked with the R&D teams and we have worked with support. There is room for improvement, especially on response times. But they're working on it and they're doing the best they can."
"The price of the solution should improve."
"CyberArk meets clients' need very spot-on. It covers everything customers ask for. As for improvements, honestly, the feedback's been really positive. I haven't heard any specific areas that need work."
"Compared to other tools like Linux, this solution isn't as user-friendly."
"It's an old product and has many areas that can be improved."
More BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management Pricing and Cost Advice →
More CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager Pricing and Cost Advice →
BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management is ranked 5th in Privileged Access Management (PAM) with 28 reviews while CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is ranked 6th in Privileged Access Management (PAM) with 28 reviews. BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management is rated 8.0, while CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management writes "Admin rights can be granted and revoked within minutes and that is what everything comes down to, for us". On the other hand, the top reviewer of CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager writes "Offers integrated solutions and expands its capabilities through strategic acquisitions". BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management is most compared with Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine), CyberArk Privileged Access Manager, Delinea Secret Server, ARCON Privileged Access Management and Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, whereas CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, CrowdStrike Falcon, CyberArk Privileged Access Manager, Tanium and SentinelOne Singularity Complete. See our BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management vs. CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager report.
See our list of best Privileged Access Management (PAM) vendors.
We monitor all Privileged Access Management (PAM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
