We performed a comparison between CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager and CyberArk Privileged Access Manager based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Privileged Access Management (PAM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable feature of the solution is its performance."
"Users can scale the solution."
"You can use it to strip users of their local admin rights and, at the same time, elevate applications for them."
"It offers great performance."
"The most valuable feature is that it does lifecycle management and that it will change to whatever the end target is."
"The product is stable."
"What sets CyberArk apart is its continuous innovation, staying ahead of the competition."
"We can do both server and endpoint protection."
"Provides improved security around having your credentials locked down and rotated regularly."
"The Password Upload Utility tool makes it easier when setting up a Safe that contains multiple accounts and has cut down the amount of time that it takes to complete the task."
"It is an extremely scalable solution."
"I'm no longer the product owner for PAM, but I can say that the most useful feature is the vault functionality, which keeps all your passwords secure in a digital vault."
"Technical support has been very responsive in navigating challenges. It is very easy to open a ticket."
"The regulation of accounts is by far the most needed and valuable part of the application."
"The most important feature is managing the credentials and implementing those policies which rotate the credentials. Session Manager is also key in not letting the users have access to those credentials. Instead, CyberArk actually manages everything by itself."
"The combination of CPM and PSM resolves a lot of use cases."
"It is hard to deal with technical support if you are not certified."
"They need much better integration with Azure AD."
"The price of the product is an area of concern where improvements are required. The product's price should be made more flexible."
"The solution is very expensive."
"The installation process is pretty difficult."
"CyberArk has some performance issues. For example, servers could not handle the solution when we first took CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager."
"The price of the solution should improve."
"CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is a perfect solution, but CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager for Linux has many issues. Another area for improvement in CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager, specifically for Windows, is that there's no way for you to check credential theft from a text file, such as a notepad file."
"Initially, there was a lot of hiccups, because there were a lot of transitions due to manual installations."
"The usual workload is sometimes delayed by the solution."
"Some of the additional features that we are looking at are in the Conjur product. I am specifically discussing key management, API Keys, and things for connecting applications in the CI/CD pipelines."
"I would like to see is the policy export and import. When we expend, we do not want to just hand do a policy."
"Its pricing is a big challenge here. When it started, the product came in at a very low cost. Now, they are the leaders in the market, so the cost has grown and is quite huge."
"We don't often contact technical support, but when we do it, the response could be faster and better."
"They can do a better job in the PSM space."
"Report creation could be improved. The policies could be more customized."
More CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager Pricing and Cost Advice →
More CyberArk Privileged Access Manager Pricing and Cost Advice →
CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is ranked 6th in Privileged Access Management (PAM) with 28 reviews while CyberArk Privileged Access Manager is ranked 1st in Privileged Access Management (PAM) with 144 reviews. CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is rated 8.2, while CyberArk Privileged Access Manager is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager writes "Offers integrated solutions and expands its capabilities through strategic acquisitions". On the other hand, the top reviewer of CyberArk Privileged Access Manager writes "Lets you ensure relevant, compliant access in good time and with an audit trail, yet lacks clarity on MITRE ATT&CK". CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is most compared with BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, CrowdStrike Falcon, Tanium and SentinelOne Singularity Complete, whereas CyberArk Privileged Access Manager is most compared with Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine), Microsoft Entra ID, Delinea Secret Server, WALLIX Bastion and F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM). See our CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager vs. CyberArk Privileged Access Manager report.
See our list of best Privileged Access Management (PAM) vendors.
We monitor all Privileged Access Management (PAM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.