We performed a comparison between BIC Platform and IBM BPM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."While this is a new product it has a mature feel from being built by a company with many years in the business."
"This is low-cost and very user friendly. A variety of models are available depending on the needs of the customer."
"The central dictionary is a valuable feature."
"The product is easy to use."
"The reach with Integration Adapters and support for adding custom Java code are valuable features."
"IBM BPM's best features include document sharing, management document creation, widget and barcode creation, and integration."
"We can scale by increasing the infrastructure which is currently running."
"IBM BPM is equipped with all the functionalities which are needed for building BPM enterprise-level applications."
"The case management and its integration with process design are good features."
"The most valuable feature of IBM BPM is the low code design, and ease of maintenance. Additionally, the integration is good and easy to do."
"The process creation."
"Setting it up is fairly easy. If somebody has knowledge of the system, he or she will be able to do it fairly quickly."
"As the product is very new, some minor features are still missing, but everything is there to handle day-to-day process modeling."
"There's an issue with the current manual that they're working on."
"The product needs improvement regarding the confidentiality of the domain information for the key administrator."
"The solution could improve its connectivity to other systems."
"I would like to see the front-end support improved because it should be fully integrated and supported."
"There are a few areas, like triggering mechanisms, externally exposed variables, and changing its values."
"Consider an admin console during deployment. I would like to migrate single instances, not the whole bunch at once."
"The initial setup can be tricky because IBM BPM is not based on a popular stack, and it's difficult to hire a developer for this product."
"If the processing gets better, it would be more efficient."
"It is a rather thick stack because you have to have WebSphere skills, IBM BPM skills, and an understanding of how the product runs on WebSphere. A lot of this will start to get a lot easier as they put it in containers, which will allow the platform to manage itself in some regards."
"IBM BPM is stable, but sometimes there are issues with the server."
"They could provide case studies to investigate and understand the functionality of business processes before development."
BIC Platform is ranked 27th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 4 reviews while IBM BPM is ranked 5th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 105 reviews. BIC Platform is rated 8.2, while IBM BPM is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of BIC Platform writes "Provides good stability, but they should add a feature for enterprise architecture". On the other hand, the top reviewer of IBM BPM writes "Offers good case management and its integration with process design but there's a learning curve". BIC Platform is most compared with SAP Signavio Process Manager, ARIS BPA, Visio, ADONIS and Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect, whereas IBM BPM is most compared with Camunda, Appian, Pega BPM, IBM Business Automation Workflow and Apache Airflow. See our BIC Platform vs. IBM BPM report.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.