We performed a comparison between Birst and Databricks based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Tableau, Oracle and others in Reporting."Dashboards and self-service reports. These are widely used by customers in the EPM domain."
"The setup was straightforward."
"Databricks helps crunch petabytes of data in a very short period of time."
"The solution is built from Spark and has integration with MLflow, which is important for our use case."
"Databricks is a scalable solution. It is the largest advantage of the solution."
"It is fast, it's scalable, and it does the job it needs to do."
"The simplicity of development is the most valuable feature."
"Databricks gives us the ability to build a lakehouse framework and do everything implicit to this type of database structure. We also like the ability to stream events. Databricks covers a broad spectrum, from reporting and machine learning to streaming events. It's important for us to have all these features in one platform."
"The most valuable aspect of the solution is its notebook. It's quite convenient to use, both terms of the research and the development and also the final deployment, I can just declare the spark jobs by the load tables. It's quite convenient."
"Customer support takes lot of time to get a solution."
"There is room for improvement in visualization."
"I would like it if Databricks made it easier to set up a project."
"The data visualization for this solution could be improved. They have started to roll out a data visualization tool inside Databricks but it is in the early stages. It's not comparable to a solution like Power BI, Luca, or Tableau."
"The solution could be improved by adding a feature that would make it more user-friendly for our team. The feature is simple, but it would be useful. Currently, our team is more familiar with the language R, but Databricks requires the use of Jupyter Notebooks which primarily supports Python. We have tried using RStudio, but it is not a fully integrated solution. To fully utilize Databricks, we have to use the Jupyter interface. One feature that would make it easier for our team to adopt the Jupyter interface would be the ability to select a specific variable or line of code and execute it within a cell. This feature is available in other Jupyter Notebooks outside of Databricks and in our own IDE, but it is not currently available within Databricks. If this feature were added, it would make the transition to using Databricks much smoother for our team."
"The product could be improved by offering an expansion of their visualization capabilities, which currently assists in development in their notebook environment."
"CI/CD needs additional leverage and support."
"Databricks may not be as easy to use as other tools, but if you simplify a tool too much, it won't have the flexibility to go in-depth. Databricks is completely in the programmer's hands. I prefer flexibility rather than simplicity."
"Databricks would benefit from enhanced metrics and tighter integration with Azure's diagnostics."
Earn 20 points
Birst is ranked 32nd in Reporting while Databricks is ranked 1st in Data Science Platforms with 78 reviews. Birst is rated 7.4, while Databricks is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Birst writes "The dashboards and Visualizer are valuable". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Databricks writes "A nice interface with good features for turning off clusters to save on computing". Birst is most compared with Microsoft Power BI, Alteryx and ThoughtSpot, whereas Databricks is most compared with Amazon SageMaker, Informatica PowerCenter, Dataiku, Dremio and Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio.
We monitor all Reporting reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.