We performed a comparison between Bitdefender GravityZone XDR and Trend Vision One based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about CrowdStrike, SentinelOne, Wazuh and others in Extended Detection and Response (XDR)."It has great stability."
"The most valuable feature is probably the aggregation and correlation of the different telemetry points with Defender for Identity, Defender for Endpoint, and Defender for Cloud Apps. All of these various things are part of that portal. We've wanted that single pane of glass for years."
"The advantage of Microsoft Defender XDR has over other XDRs in the market is that it's easy to use. You can quickly differentiate between alerts, incidents, devices, software, etc. It's easier to investigate an incident, and you have so many options. You can automate investigations and use playbooks. There's also the live response session, which is something you can't find in any other XDR."
"I like the easy integration and advanced possibilities. We can implement it at customer sites in a few clicks, but we can also dive deep and drill down to extended features. There's a very good starting point to get into this product and all the features from Defender."
"The integration with other Microsoft solutions is the most valuable feature."
"A crucial aspect for our team is the inclusion of identity and access management tools from the vendor."
"The product integrates security into one tool instead of having third-party security tools."
"It's a very scalable tool that can be used in a very small environment or in a very large environment. Everything can be managed from a simple dashboard and can be scaled up or down depending on the customer's environment."
"Scalability is pretty easy. It's easy to increase the capacity. You can just add on licenses to the existing license, and the duration of the license can be adjusted. For example, you've already bought a license for a year, and you want to add some more users. We can just add on licenses for the remaining period so that the entire organization can have the same expiry date. That makes renewal easier."
"I'm satisfied with the level of coverage. The policies have been very useful and detailed."
"We've found the pricing to be reasonable."
"The most important thing for us as a customer is that we can spend more time in other places as it's simpler to have that overview. We have much more time for other tasks."
"It helps a lot to understand where the threat is coming from, where is it going, how is it being dealt with, et cetera."
"We are very impressed with the single pane of glass visibility that Trend Micro XDR provides."
"Scaling is not a problem at all."
"What I like the most about Trend Micro XDR is that the detection and response domain extends to the network. It goes beyond the endpoint and includes data about the network which lets you pinpoint patient zero as well as the root cause of the attack."
"I like that it is a comprehensive security solution with a lot of features. You can say XDR is an end-to-end security solution with endpoint security. It includes all your servers, networks, and other devices. The endpoint security solution does not cover this. Plus, machine learning and features like that are the main things in XDR solutions."
"The patching capability should be there. Patching is something that you cannot do even though you see the vulnerabilities present in your environment. For patching, you have to depend on another solution."
"At times, there may be delays in the execution of certain actions and their effects."
"I would like more of the features in Defender for 365 to be included in the smaller licenses. Even if I buy a small license and don't need everything, security shouldn't be a question. Security is one of the main aspects of all projects from our side, so it would be nice to have more features in the smaller licenses."
"Microsoft frequently changes the names of its products, sometimes even renaming entire portals or features."
"The mobile app support for Android and iOS is difficult and needs improvement."
"The user interface of Microsoft 365 Defender could improve. They could make it simpler."
"Offboarding latency should be reduced. Even after a device has been successfully offboarded using a particular offboarding script, it still shows up as onboarded."
"The onboarding and offboarding need improvement. I work with other vendors as well, and they have an option to add a device or remove a device from the portal, whereas with Microsoft 365 Defender, we need to do that manually. However, once you do that, everything can be controlled through the portal, but getting the device onboarded and offboarded is currently manual. If we have an option to simply remove a device from the portal or get a device added from the portal, it would be more convenient. The rest of the features are similar. This is the only area where I found it different from others. I would also like to be able to simply filter with a few of the queries that are already there."
"Another area of improvement is CPU utilization. CPU utilization could be improved."
"It is very expensive."
"The zero trust is a bit complicated compared to other parts of the solution."
"It would be ideal if they could improve the control of connectivity between sensors."
"Having more variables within the playbook would be useful. It would allow us to have more refined playbooks for the business. It would allow us to take stronger action through a playbook. It will give us confidence to target a particular area of business where our risk tolerance might be higher or lower. We would like to have more granular playbooks."
"It should integrate with more tools. There are a lot of tools that can do the PTP dump."
"There isn't a lot I'd do to change it. The web interface could be improved to sort of make it a little easier to manage multiple clients out of one location. It could also be made a bit easier to sort of manage the licensing side of it."
"Vision One's search could be improved. While the platform is very user-friendly, the search feature uses terms that aren't as intuitive."
"The solution only supports Windows and Mac. It would be helpful if it could support other OS, such as Linux."
Bitdefender GravityZone XDR is ranked 19th in Extended Detection and Response (XDR) with 1 review while Trend Vision One is ranked 6th in Extended Detection and Response (XDR) with 43 reviews. Bitdefender GravityZone XDR is rated 9.0, while Trend Vision One is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Bitdefender GravityZone XDR writes "Easy to use in terms of management and console is very user-friendly". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Trend Vision One writes "The integration of toolsets is key, enabling automation, and vendor has been tremendous partner for us". Bitdefender GravityZone XDR is most compared with Wazuh and Microsoft Defender for Cloud, whereas Trend Vision One is most compared with CrowdStrike Falcon, Trend Micro Apex One, SentinelOne Singularity Complete, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint and Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks.
See our list of best Extended Detection and Response (XDR) vendors and best Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vendors.
We monitor all Extended Detection and Response (XDR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
