We performed a comparison between Board and Oracle Planning and Budgeting Cloud based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Performance Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."We have better reporting and have been able to better track performance."
"Primary valuable features are its flexibility and versatility and, obviously, functionality goes along with that. Plus, it does that at a small footprint in the file servers, and does it very efficiently."
"I liked the way that I felt as a user and administrator of it. There were a lot of clicks, drops, drags, etc. versus writing code."
"It is easy to make quick updates. As the business changes, we can maintain the tool without programming help from IT."
"The tool seems to have a lot of ways to handle scaling."
"The support from the BOARD team and their consultants is great. Whenever I use technical support, they are good."
"BOARD technical support is knowledgeable and helpful."
"Our clients have improved a lot in terms of coordination and communication. This has improved their internal performance."
"The product has a direct plugin to Microsoft Excel."
"Beneficial analysis and easy to do management adjustments."
"We previously used Oracle EDS, and when comparing it to this solution, this solution has a much better interface. There are lots of advantages of the new solutions. Having it on the cloud, we are able to forget about keeping them updated or taking care of the database. We have minimal maintenance."
"The tool improves the organizational budgeting process in several ways. One significant aspect is the extensionable functionality it offers. To illustrate, consider a scenario where a company has factories in Mexico producing Volkswagen and Kentucky producing Ford."
"It gives you an end-to-end solution from integrating data from the source system to reporting. So it's a highly recommended tool."
"The most valuable features of Oracle Planning and Budgeting Cloud are the many capabilities it provides."
"The most valuable feature is the data integration in Oracle Planning and Budgeting Cloud."
"Once you do the budget in Oracle ERP, you can upload it, but it's easier to create and manage budgets in the Oracle budgeting tool itself. For example, if you have a shortfall in the budget, it's easier to manage that and the forms, too, especially if you also have Oracle Forms Management. You can get the forms from somewhere and then transform those forms into budget heads."
"We have had some challenges with newer version of the rollout in terms of stability."
"I'd like to see a more passive report user for enterprise report writers that aren't particularly technical."
"The product can be improved by making it possible to know where cubes are used."
"It would be nice to have more connectors for other data sources. BOARD is a great tool to become the single source of the truth. Making it easier to connect data sources for niche software tools will make it easier to keep everything in one place."
"Building similar models entirely from scratch could be made quicker with transfer abilities between databases and capsules."
"One thing that I personally would like to see is additional visualization tools for visuals."
"Sometimes, the data disappears from the product."
"If we could upload other data, e.g., pivot tables which can be done in BOARD already, that we have pre-existing and have that data distribute to more complex spreadsheets, I would like that going forward."
"The tool's interface is outdated. However, OneStream is easier to navigate."
"Some of the things in this product are just too cumbersome and we don't need them and they make it harder to do certain things, or certain things have to have more specific names or descriptions."
"Oracle Planning and Budgeting Cloud could improve by having better integration with some other modules that we would add to this solution."
"The FR recording studio that is used to build reports is clunky and awful to use. This could be improved a lot. The solution does have problems and limitations."
"One potential improvement would be a more visual workflow, as the current method using a tax list is not as effective."
"There is middleware that we need to purchase for our use case that should be provided in Oracle Planning and Budgeting Cloud. We should not have to purchase the additional solution and the integration should be seamless."
"For HR, the workforce planning out of the box is complicated. For most users, it's not easy, and it requires a learning curve. It's not very user-friendly. It can be improved."
"Oracle Planning and Budgeting Cloud could improve. There are times when the forms are slow in saving and calculating."
More Oracle Planning and Budgeting Cloud Pricing and Cost Advice →
Board is ranked 11th in Business Performance Management with 35 reviews while Oracle Planning and Budgeting Cloud is ranked 3rd in Business Performance Management with 17 reviews. Board is rated 8.6, while Oracle Planning and Budgeting Cloud is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Board writes "A stable solution with good user-experience, easy deployment but needs some improvement with engine ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Planning and Budgeting Cloud writes " Budgeting scenarios and versions helps us migrate data, visualize data, and do variant reporting". Board is most compared with Anaplan, SAP Analytics Cloud, IBM Planning Analytics, Oracle Hyperion and Planful, whereas Oracle Planning and Budgeting Cloud is most compared with Oracle HFM, Anaplan, Oracle Hyperion, IBM Planning Analytics and Axiom EPM. See our Board vs. Oracle Planning and Budgeting Cloud report.
See our list of best Business Performance Management vendors.
We monitor all Business Performance Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.