We performed a comparison between Board and UNIT4 prevero based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Anaplan, Oracle, Jedox and others in Business Performance Management."It has definitely saved us time, especially in our budget and planning processes."
"The reporting part has been very valuable as the capabilities of the tool do not have to change graphs, change how grids are displayed, and can create reports on the fly."
"Our clients have improved a lot in terms of coordination and communication. This has improved their internal performance."
"I liked the way that I felt as a user and administrator of it. There were a lot of clicks, drops, drags, etc. versus writing code."
"Our data is now more structured. Between our data warehouse and BOARD, which are both brand new, we now have a more structured data view with more accurate, timely data."
"The dynamic selections on the screen and details by function are also valuable for inside the data view."
"We have better reporting and have been able to better track performance."
"Primary valuable features are its flexibility and versatility and, obviously, functionality goes along with that. Plus, it does that at a small footprint in the file servers, and does it very efficiently."
"Its workflow is straightforward and simple to understand."
"We are looking for ways to distinguish zeros versus nulls in BOARD."
"It's very powerful, but there is also a big learning curve. It should be a little more intuitive."
"We are looking at ways to improve how we deal with security in BOARD and other similar things. "
"It would be nice to see truly transferable processes from model to model, as well as a method of building repetitive processes."
"The product can be improved by making it possible to know where cubes are used."
"What could be better is the manual... nowadays, most people use a web client, but on the Board manual website, a lot of the information is only about the Windows client. If they could update that, it would be helpful."
"It can have more functionality for narrative reporting. They should also improve their training courses, which are currently very lightweight. When you get into more complex things, it is quite difficult to figure out what you're supposed to do, and you have to look at a lot of videos before you actually understand, which is a bit frustrating. Their training can be more comprehensive."
"I would like to see better relationships with the partners."
"There is a little bit of reliance upon understanding the syntax of the actions that you want to take. Some of the other competitors have moved forward with that in terms of being able to make it more drag and drop and more logical, but there is still some way to go for UNIT4 in doing that, but they're getting there. With all these things, automation helps. The more they can do to simplify some of the complexities from the financial reporting, evaluation, and analysis sides, the better it would be. I'd like to see more automation and more simplicity from an end-user point of view."
Board is ranked 11th in Business Performance Management with 35 reviews while UNIT4 prevero is ranked 21st in Business Performance Management. Board is rated 8.6, while UNIT4 prevero is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Board writes "A stable solution with good user-experience, easy deployment but needs some improvement with engine ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of UNIT4 prevero writes "Workflow is straightforward and simple to understand, but there should be more automation and more simplicity from an end-user point of view". Board is most compared with Anaplan, SAP Analytics Cloud, IBM Planning Analytics and Oracle Hyperion, whereas UNIT4 prevero is most compared with IBM Cognos.
See our list of best Business Performance Management vendors.
We monitor all Business Performance Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
