We performed a comparison between Boomi iPaaS and webMethods Integration Server based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."This is a fairly easy-to-use tool for integration which can be self-taught for those with a bit of a technical background."
"The connection configuration part and the drag-and-drop integration module are the most valuable features for me."
"It has been a stable product."
"The tool's most valuable features I've found are related to debugging and testing. It makes it easy to track execution, documents, and process history. This functionality is particularly useful for identifying issues with data and providing insights to the business."
"The product's initial setup phase was easy."
"It is a low-code and high-configuration platform, which is very valuable. Develop once and run anywhere is another useful feature. It also has connectors for more than 200 applications. It provides value for money. Our customers who have implemented this solution have a very high ROI."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is its monitoring part to debug certain issues and find problems."
"I like the tool's optimization feature."
"The development is very fast. If you know what you're doing, you can develop something very easily and very fast."
"Broker and UM are the best features."
"The MFT component of webMethods, for example, is easy to set up and convenient to use. It handles files very efficiently and it is easy to automate tasks with complex schedules. Monitoring is centralized to MWS which can be used to monitor other products as well (Trading Networks, BPM, MFT, etc.)"
"The tool supports gRPC."
"The most valuable feature of webMethods Integration Server is all the capabilities it provides. We leverage most of the features, that they have offered to us. Our vendor has made some additional features on top of the webMethods Integration Server and we use all the features together."
"Operationally, I consider the solution to be quite good."
"All of the components are very independent but are tied together to give the business value."
"From a user perspective, the feature which I like the most about Integration Server is its designer."
"There are still some areas that need improvement. For example, when updates are going on, the product becomes very slow."
"They need to introduce more configurable functions to remove scripting or coding. Scripting should be minimized. It should have exhaustive functions. Currently, it lacks in this aspect."
"The product's UI could be more convenient."
"In my experience, I haven't encountered any major issues with the tool. However, there could be a learning curve for new users, especially depending on which tool you're using. For example, I've used MuleSoft in the past, which is more code-oriented and requires knowledge of Java. Transitioning to Boomi AtomSphere Integration took me a couple of months because of differences in terminology."
"Have to create some of our own pre-built connectors."
"They should create a custom connector option. With this, they could improve where the user can create the connector, based on their usage."
"It crashes if we run high-volume integration."
"The product could be a little bit more user-friendly."
"Other products have been using AI and cloud enhancements, but webMethods Integration Server is still lagging in that key area."
"There should be better logging, or a better dashboard, to allow you to see see the logs of the services."
"In terms of improvement, it would be better if it adapted quicker to open standards. It took a while for API specification before the last version was available. The spec of version two was rather quick."
"The interface needs some work. It is not very user-friendly."
"On the monitoring side of things, the UI for monitoring could be improved. It's a bit cumbersome to work with."
"This solution could be improved by offering subscription based licensing."
"The deployment should be simplified."
"In terms of scale, I would give it a four out of 10."
More webMethods Integration Server Pricing and Cost Advice →
Boomi iPaaS is ranked 5th in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) with 25 reviews while webMethods Integration Server is ranked 3rd in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) with 60 reviews. Boomi iPaaS is rated 7.8, while webMethods Integration Server is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Boomi iPaaS writes "Stable product, suitable for limited integrations and lacks flexibility ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of webMethods Integration Server writes "Event-driven with lots of helpful formats, but minimal learning resources available". Boomi iPaaS is most compared with Microsoft Azure Logic Apps, SSIS, Oracle Integration Cloud Service, AWS Glue and Azure Data Factory, whereas webMethods Integration Server is most compared with IBM Integration Bus, webMethods.io Integration, Mule ESB, TIBCO BusinessWorks and Oracle Service Bus. See our Boomi iPaaS vs. webMethods Integration Server report.
We monitor all Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
