We performed a comparison between Camunda and TIBCO iProcess Suite based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."One valuable feature of the solution is its flexibility."
"Camunda Platform has a very good interface for workflow and business process design."
"It is quite easy to build a simple process without any knowledge of programming."
"The architecture is good because it's a headless workflow. I can create my own frontend, and it's fully API-based."
"It has been a stable solution so far since it meets our needs, including data modeling, which we need to do before we embark on analyzing and optimizing the business processes."
"The most valuable feature is the ability to share the logic within the rules engine with the business, so you can put it up for everybody to read."
"The graphical interface is very beneficial."
"I love that Camunda is a very developer-friendly platform, and my customers have evaluated the pricing as reasonable."
"It's very simple to use and the integration features between Java and other services within the workflow are very easy."
"The user interface needs some polishing because it is too technical for end-users to use it."
"The primary issue regarding the Camuto platform is its high cost of training. This is why I haven't discussed it extensively, as compared to other products that are more affordable in terms of developer training."
"The GUI needs to be improved, with more configuration options."
"I think it would be important to internationalize the Cockpit and the Admin as well as with the Tasklist."
"The support definitely can be improved. Apart from that, the language should be extendable to other platforms. If I want to write, I'll run a different platform, like Python code on top of it, or COBOL code on top of it, and it should support those languages."
"The product does not have a dictionary."
"Lacking in forms visualization."
"Camunda could be improved by making it easier to modify a process. You can program it to follow a process, but it is difficult to modify the process when the application is in use. It could also be improved by making it easier to use the visual platform without needing to be informed on that. Sometimes, we programmers haven't used it in the past, and it's a bit difficult to learn it."
"Our customers and developers have complained that the UI is a little bit confusing."
Earn 20 points
Camunda is ranked 1st in Business Process Management (BPM) with 71 reviews while TIBCO iProcess Suite is ranked 40th in Business Process Management (BPM). Camunda is rated 8.2, while TIBCO iProcess Suite is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Camunda writes "Open-source, easy to define new processes, and easy to transition to new business process definitions". On the other hand, the top reviewer of TIBCO iProcess Suite writes "An easy-to-use solution with great integration". Camunda is most compared with Apache Airflow, Bizagi, Pega BPM, IBM BPM and Appian, whereas TIBCO iProcess Suite is most compared with Apache Airflow, TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM and Pega BPM. See our Camunda vs. TIBCO iProcess Suite report.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
