We performed a comparison between Apache Airflow and TIBCO iProcess Suite based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."We have been quite satisfied with the stability of the solution."
"The best part of Airflow is its direct support for Python, especially because Python is so important for data science, engineering, and design. This makes the programmatic aspect of our work easy for us, and it means we can automate a lot."
"This is a simple tool to automate using Python."
"It's stable."
"We're running it on a virtual server, which we can easily upgrade if needed."
"The reason we went with Airflow is its DAG presentation, that shows the relationships among everything. It's more of a configuration-driven workflow."
"Apache Airflow is easy to use and can monitor task execution easily. For instance, when performing setup tasks, you can conveniently view the logs without delving into the job details."
"Apache Airflow is useful for workflow automation, making it capable of automating pipelines, data pipelines, and data warehouse processes."
"It's very simple to use and the integration features between Java and other services within the workflow are very easy."
"I want to see Apache Airflow have more integrations with more production-based databases since it is an area where the product lacks currently."
"The platform's stability needs improvement, particularly regarding occasional interruptions due to networking issues."
"We're currently using version 1.10, but I understand that there's a lot of improvements in version 2. In the earlier version that we're using, we sometimes have problems with maintenance complexity. Actually using Airflow is okay, but maintaining it has been difficult."
"There is a need for more features on experimental evolution steps."
"I would like to see it more friendly for other use cases."
"We have faced scenarios where Apache Airflow becomes non-responsive, leading to job failures. To resolve such situations, we had to manually reboot Apache Airflow since it doesn't provide an option to restart within the application. This necessitated modifying some configurations to initiate a restart of all Apache Airflow components. Although Apache Airflow is generally dependable, it may occasionally encounter glitches that can disrupt production flows and batches."
"Adding more automated components in Apache Airflow for basic things like exporting the data would be helpful."
"Apache Airflow should have better integration with cloud platforms."
"Our customers and developers have complained that the UI is a little bit confusing."
Earn 20 points
Apache Airflow is ranked 2nd in Business Process Management (BPM) with 31 reviews while TIBCO iProcess Suite is ranked 40th in Business Process Management (BPM). Apache Airflow is rated 8.0, while TIBCO iProcess Suite is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Apache Airflow writes "Enable seamless integration with various connectivity and integrated services, including BigQuery and Python operators ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of TIBCO iProcess Suite writes "An easy-to-use solution with great integration". Apache Airflow is most compared with Camunda, IBM BPM, Informatica Cloud API and App Integration, IBM Business Automation Workflow and AWS Step Functions, whereas TIBCO iProcess Suite is most compared with TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM, Pega BPM and Camunda. See our Apache Airflow vs. TIBCO iProcess Suite report.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.