We performed a comparison between Cassandra and Oracle NoSQL based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about MongoDB, Couchbase, InfluxData and others in NoSQL Databases."I am satisfied with the performance."
"The time series data was one of the best features along with auto publishing."
"The most valuable feature of Cassandra is its fast retrieval. Additionally, the solution can handle large amounts of data. It is the quickest application we use."
"The use of Cassandra in real-time data analytics has been pivotal for our e-commerce platform. As our platform operates 24/7, providing services to sellers and customers alike, the need for real-time updates is paramount."
"Cassandra is good. It's better than CouchDB, and we are using it in parallel with CouchDB. Cassandra looks better and is more user-friendly."
"The most valuable features of this solution are its speed and distributed nature."
"Our primary use case for the solution is testing."
"Can achieve continuous data without a single downtime because of node to node ring architecture."
"The tool is easy to learn."
"The tool performs well."
"NoSQL has high availability. I think it's perfect from a technical perspective. It's quick to run and go."
"The product meets expectations when it comes to stability."
"Depending upon our schema, we can't make ORDER BY or GROUP BY clauses in the product."
"The solution is not easy to use because it is a big database and you have to learn the interface. This is the case though in most of these solutions."
"The initial setup of Cassandra can be difficult in the configuration. There might be a need to have assistance. The implementation process can six months for connecting to certain databases."
"Maybe they can improve their performance in data fetching from a high volume of data sets."
"Fine-tuning was a bit of a challenge."
"There could be more integration, and it could be more user-friendly."
"Doesn't support a solution that can give aggregation."
"The solution doesn't have joins between tables so you need other tools for that."
"Handling big data in a user-friendly way is currently a bit of an issue. The dashboard for this needs some work."
"The licensing model is bad."
"Oracle could improve how NoSQL works in containers. I don't think NoSQL needs any new features, but I want to see new features in the Oracle Cloud Infrastructure. I would like to see some improvements in OCI's building options."
"The installation is difficult."
Cassandra is ranked 4th in NoSQL Databases with 19 reviews while Oracle NoSQL is ranked 8th in NoSQL Databases with 7 reviews. Cassandra is rated 8.0, while Oracle NoSQL is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Cassandra writes "Well-equipped to handle a massive influx of data and billions of requests". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle NoSQL writes "The implementation is simple and only takes 15 to 30 minutes". Cassandra is most compared with Couchbase, MongoDB, InfluxDB, ScyllaDB and DataStax, whereas Oracle NoSQL is most compared with MongoDB, ScyllaDB, InfluxDB, Aerospike Database 7 and Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop.
See our list of best NoSQL Databases vendors.
We monitor all NoSQL Databases reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.