We performed a comparison between Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop and Oracle NoSQL based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about MongoDB, Couchbase, InfluxData and others in NoSQL Databases."It has the best proxy, security, and support features compared to open-source products."
"CDH has a wide variety of proprietary tools that we use, like Impala. So from that perspective, it's quite useful as opposed to something open-source. We get a lot of value from Cloudera's proprietary tools."
"The scalability of Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop is excellent."
"The file system is a valuable feature."
"The tool can be deployed using different container technologies, which makes it very scalable."
"We had a data warehouse before all the data. We can process a lot more data structures."
"The most valuable feature is that I can use CDH for almost all use cases across all industries, including the financial sector, public sector, private retailers, and so on."
"The product provides better data processing features than other tools."
"The tool performs well."
"NoSQL has high availability. I think it's perfect from a technical perspective. It's quick to run and go."
"The tool is easy to learn."
"The product meets expectations when it comes to stability."
"Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop has a limited feature list and a lot of costs involved."
"The tool's ability to be deployed on a cloud model is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop is not always completely stable in some cases, which can be a concern for big data solutions."
"The security of this solution could be improved. There should also be a way to basically have a blockchain enabled storage with the HDFS."
"There is a maximum of a one-gigabyte block size, which is an area of storage that can be improved upon."
"The initial setup of Cloudera is difficult."
"The procedure for operations could be simplified."
"The user infrastructure and user interface needs to be improved, as well as the performance. The GUI needs to be better."
"Handling big data in a user-friendly way is currently a bit of an issue. The dashboard for this needs some work."
"The licensing model is bad."
"Oracle could improve how NoSQL works in containers. I don't think NoSQL needs any new features, but I want to see new features in the Oracle Cloud Infrastructure. I would like to see some improvements in OCI's building options."
"The installation is difficult."
More Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop Pricing and Cost Advice →
Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop is ranked 5th in NoSQL Databases with 47 reviews while Oracle NoSQL is ranked 8th in NoSQL Databases with 7 reviews. Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop is rated 8.0, while Oracle NoSQL is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop writes "Good end-to-end security features and we like that it's cloud independent". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle NoSQL writes "The implementation is simple and only takes 15 to 30 minutes". Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop is most compared with Amazon EMR, HPE Ezmeral Data Fabric, Apache Spark, Cassandra and ScyllaDB, whereas Oracle NoSQL is most compared with MongoDB, Cassandra, ScyllaDB, InfluxDB and Aerospike Database 7.
See our list of best NoSQL Databases vendors.
We monitor all NoSQL Databases reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
