We performed a comparison between Check Point Remote Access VPN and N-able Take Control based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Remote Access solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The ability to create your trigger data domains is the solution's most valuable feature."
"This platform has developed a reliable communication infrastructure that employees can use to communicate with remote workers."
"The solution offers great security features, including zero-day protection, malware protection, anti-phishing, et cetera."
"The solution offers high scalability as far as adding more users."
"It is easy to install the Endpoint Remote Access VPN client on different platforms."
"The solution has been solid for me for over five years."
"Among its most valuable features is how it quickly and easily connects everyone to the VPN service."
"A single login based on a second authentication factor is giving us the possibility of integrating third-party services for authentication based on a security scheme."
"The most valuable part of N-able Take Control is being able to remotely access your customer's site. You are able to view their network. Once you have it set up, it's always available. N-able Take Control can be used even when other remote access controls have been made."
"Take Control enables you to collaborate with end users. It's for supporting a workstation where you want the person on the other side to see you moving their mouse, and you can work with them."
"The maximum it is giving us is only 5 licenses and if you need more, they must be purchased separately."
"Check Point Remote Access VPN's current configuration has some limitations and issues. One major drawback is the inability to configure multiple gateways from the same management server for VPN access."
"Price category and smooth renewal of agreement should be considered for flawless and quick onboarding of clients and partners."
"The client-side UI is fundamental, and there is nothing to see."
"Improved scalability would allow the solution to handle larger numbers of users and devices without a significant impact on performance."
"Sometimes it causes the consumption of machine resources, and also improves the scanning since they consume many resources in the clients' machines."
"There needs to be a way to create a VPN client specific to our environment so that we can easily lock down who can connect."
"The Compliance software blade is available only for the Windows operating systems family, so no macOS security checks are implemented and performed."
"We've seen some latency problems in AWS environments. Aside from that, it's a pretty solid service."
"The dashboards I do not use because there are issues. The solution monitors your antivirus and other programs but it does not seem to work well."
More Check Point Remote Access VPN Pricing and Cost Advice →
Check Point Remote Access VPN is ranked 5th in Remote Access with 62 reviews while N-able Take Control is ranked 19th in Remote Access with 2 reviews. Check Point Remote Access VPN is rated 8.8, while N-able Take Control is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Check Point Remote Access VPN writes "Is easy to use and has a nice interface, but the scalability needs to improve". On the other hand, the top reviewer of N-able Take Control writes "Valuable remote access feature, highly stable, and scalable". Check Point Remote Access VPN is most compared with OpenVPN Access Server, Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client, Fortinet FortiClient, Check Point Harmony Mobile and Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange, whereas N-able Take Control is most compared with TeamViewer, Dameware Remote Support and Microsoft Remote Desktop Services. See our Check Point Remote Access VPN vs. N-able Take Control report.
See our list of best Remote Access vendors.
We monitor all Remote Access reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.