We performed a comparison between Checkmarx One and Digital.ai Application Security based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Sonar, Veracode, Checkmarx and others in Application Security Tools."What I like best about Checkmarx is that it has fewer false positives than other products, giving you better results."
"It allows for SAST scanning of uncompiled code. Further, it natively integrates with all key repos formats (Git, TFS, SVN, Perforce, etc)."
"Compared to the solutions we used previously, Checkmarx has reduced our workload by almost 75%."
"The user interface is excellent. It's very user friendly."
"Most valuable features include: ease of use, dashboard. interface and the ability to report."
"The main thing we find valuable about Checkmarx is the ease of use. It's easy to initiate scans and triage defects."
"The process of remediating software security vulnerabilities can now be performed (ongoing) as portions of the application are being built in advance of being compiled."
"The administration in Checkmarx is very good."
"I used the tool to prepare for the interview as a Business Developer. It helped me improve my understanding on software security."
"C, C++, VB and T-SQL are not supported by this product. Although, C and C++ were advertised as being supported."
"As the solution becomes more complex and feature rich, it takes more time to debug and resolve problems. Feature-wise, we have no complaints, but Checkmarx becomes harder to maintain as the product becomes more complex. When I talk to support, it takes them longer to fix the problem than it used to."
"One area for improvement in Checkmarx is pricing, as it's more expensive than other products."
"The resolutions should also be provided. For example, if the user faces any problem regarding an installation due to the internal security policies of their company, there should be a resolution offered."
"I would like the product to include more debugging and developed tools. It needs to also add enhancements on the coding side."
"Creating and editing custom rules in Checkmarx is difficult because the license for the editor comes at an additional cost, and there is a steep learning curve."
"The integration could improve by including, for example, DevSecOps."
"Implementing a blackout time for any user or teams: Needs improvement."
"I would like the tool to integrate AI and automation that is dedicated to detecting software vulnerabilities."
Checkmarx One is ranked 3rd in Application Security Tools with 67 reviews while Digital.ai Application Security is ranked 37th in Application Security Tools with 1 review. Checkmarx One is rated 7.6, while Digital.ai Application Security is rated 6.0. The top reviewer of Checkmarx One writes "The report function is a great, configurable asset but sometimes yields false positives". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Digital.ai Application Security writes "Helps to improve knowledge on software security ". Checkmarx One is most compared with SonarQube, Veracode, Fortify on Demand, Snyk and Coverity, whereas Digital.ai Application Security is most compared with SonarQube and PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional.
See our list of best Application Security Tools vendors.
We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.