We performed a comparison between Cisco Secure Network Analytics and ManageEngine OpManager based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Network Monitoring Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."We can manage the entire system across the network and troubleshoot the pain points."
"The single dashboard is a valuable feature."
"Cisco Stealthwatch provides the solutions analytics and threat detection capabilities that I am looking for. It has also improved the network visibility of our organization."
"The ability to send data flow from other places and have them all in one place is very valuable for us."
"I believe this solution has reduced our incident response time."
"Being able to identify specific date closed across the network is invaluable."
"The solution has increased our threat detection rate. Cisco Stealthwatch has not reduced our incident response times. It has not reduced the amount of time it takes us to detect immediate threats. It has reduced false positives."
"Visibility. The ability to look East and West. To see what is passing through your circuits, where it is coming from, and how big it is."
"Using the Cognitive Analytics feature, we have complete visibility that we didn’t have before."
"Provides easily identifiable anomalies that you can't see with signature detections."
"The solution is easy to deploy. It's also easy to manage and monitor the environment. Instead of being reactive, it's proactive."
"The solution is finely stable."
"Some of the most valuable features are the accessibility of the solution and the fact that it is simpler than other products. For example, discovering devices in the network is very simple, making it user-friendly."
"Device backups are smooth and managed centrally, with a nice dashboard, so you can quickly see the status."
"The detections are fine when they work."
"The most valuable feature is the network-related reporting."
"I liked Network Configuration Manager. They had some pretty decent features there, and they also had pretty good monitoring and alerts."
"The integration with the firewall monitoring, the security monitoring, is great."
"The Wi-Fi side needs improvement."
"The technical support needs improvement."
"It's a good solid solution but integration with Network Access Control products with Cisco ISE would be good."
"It's too complicated to install, when starting out."
"If they can make this product more web-based, that would be amazing."
"At my company, we might not be using it enough with other applications that we have that can integrate with it."
"They should include Citrix VDIs in the next release."
"I would like to see it better organized when I'm looking at it."
"I would like to see more and cleaner reporting. For example, if I pull up Steven and I want to look and maybe compare him to what you've done in the past week, and compare that to the past six months, the point would be to see what the difference in activity looks like over this time. I don't see that capability in reporting to date. You see that trend but you don't really see a straightforward comparison. That right there is key to what we want to see about the normal activity."
"I think the interface is a little lacking. The interface seems like it just needs to be modernized. It's been the same interface now, ever since I've seen it probably four years ago."
"The main area for improvement for ManageEngine OpManager is its performance."
"The licensing model is confusing."
"It would be great if there were some sort of artificial intelligence feature which would help us make improvements in the network once we find an issue, and do it automatically."
"ManageEngine OpManager could improve by having a better cloud presence."
"The integration with various OEM products could be simplified."
"The solution is a bit difficult to configure. There are quite a number of configurations and plugins that you must handle early in the process."
"I would like to see more enhancements made to the product."
"We had some stability issues at the outset that have since been resolved."
More Juniper Mist Premium Analytics Pricing and Cost Advice →
More Cisco Secure Network Analytics Pricing and Cost Advice →
Cisco Secure Network Analytics is ranked 24th in Network Monitoring Software with 57 reviews while ManageEngine OpManager is ranked 15th in Network Monitoring Software with 44 reviews. Cisco Secure Network Analytics is rated 8.2, while ManageEngine OpManager is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Cisco Secure Network Analytics writes "Increased the visibility of what is happening in our network". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ManageEngine OpManager writes "Helps us monitor all the infrastructure in our company but UI monitoring is not practical". Cisco Secure Network Analytics is most compared with Darktrace, Cisco Secure Cloud Analytics, ThousandEyes, Vectra AI and Arista NDR, whereas ManageEngine OpManager is most compared with SolarWinds NPM, Zabbix, PRTG Network Monitor, SCOM and Nagios XI. See our Cisco Secure Network Analytics vs. ManageEngine OpManager report.
See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.
We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.