We performed a comparison between Cisco UCS B-Series and PowerEdge C based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Blade Servers solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Stateless Blade is the best feature."
"In terms of the flexibility of the tool to adapt to technology needs, I think it is a very good solution."
"The solution's most valuable feature is KVM Launch Manager."
"The solution has the ability to reuse or divide the networking, making it a flexible networking environment."
"The solution is very reliable in comparison to the other brands."
"Cisco UCS B-Series is scalable."
"It's modular."
"The most valuable feature of the solution stems from the fact that it is easily scalable."
"With the tool, we can easily upgrade and ensure compatibility between operating systems, hardwares and drivers. Among other features, the hardware also stands out because it is certified and aligns with the processor manufacturers like Intel. This enables them to offer the latest options which are not available with other suppliers."
"Technical support has been helpful."
"One of the main features that attract customers to buy their products is the great management tool and almost zero failure rate, making it easy to use."
"The initial setup is not complex. It's a user-friendly tool."
"The performance is good."
"The product has high performance and no downtime."
"It's a good product. Virtualization on it is good."
"It is a scalable platform."
"Cisco UCS B-Series competitors have similar features as they do, Cisco needs to make some changes to make their offering better."
"There are some shortcomings in the product when you look at it from the perspective of the area involving multiple configurations, making it an aspect where improvements are required."
"The integration is an area where Cisco UCS B-Series needs to provide users with more details."
"There is a delay in the product's reporting and the rebooting system compared to servers from other vendors."
"Its scalability could be better."
"The high price of the solution is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"The solution is expensive."
"The price of this product is too high. They should work to make it more affordable."
"A feature that needs to be added is the ability for full container storage."
"There has been an increase in quality issues."
"The product’s pricing could be a little cheaper."
"The solution’s pricing could be cheaper."
"The price must be improved."
"The product’s cost needs improvement."
"There is some trouble with the stability part of the product, making it an area where improvements are required."
"The VxRail should be opened to allow other virtualization platforms to be used."
Cisco UCS B-Series is ranked 3rd in Blade Servers with 64 reviews while PowerEdge C is ranked 5th in Blade Servers with 23 reviews. Cisco UCS B-Series is rated 8.6, while PowerEdge C is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of Cisco UCS B-Series writes "Robust hardware and efficient management of hardware, creating group policies, such as scrub policies and maintenance policies". On the other hand, the top reviewer of PowerEdge C writes "Easy to deploy and has high performance and no downtime". Cisco UCS B-Series is most compared with HPE Synergy, Dell PowerEdge M, HPE BladeSystem, Super Micro SuperBlade and Pure Storage FlashBlade, whereas PowerEdge C is most compared with Huawei FusionServer X Series and HPE Apollo. See our Cisco UCS B-Series vs. PowerEdge C report.
See our list of best Blade Servers vendors.
We monitor all Blade Servers reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
