We performed a comparison between Citrix ShareFile and SharePoint based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Dropbox, Box, Microsoft and others in Content Collaboration Platforms."Easy to manage and fully secure."
"This provides us with a secure way of sending tax returns without having to use passwords."
"The solution is scalable."
"The Enterprise Dropbox solution is highly integrated with Microsoft's Office 365 and Azure products."
"Citrix has a very good file auditing features and security features."
"The solution would query the Active Directory, and if new accounts were identified, Citrix ShareFile would add them automatically."
"It's user-friendly for end users."
"ShareFile gives you all of the features of cloud providers, but in an on-premises solution."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is file sharing or information sharing."
"SharePoint has made things easier with the increased functionality for building the portals, microsites, and total integration with Microsoft categories."
"No code and low code, scalable, and stable collaboration platform. Straightforward to set up. Its support system is good and offers fast issue resolution."
"Staff training is reduced because learning basic SharePoint is not as complicated as an EDRMS."
"It has made us faster and more efficient."
"Ability to store files of any type."
"The most valuable features are the Integrations, web site, and search."
"Tech support tops off as excellent."
"There are sometimes scalability issues after updates."
"My only issue with this solution is the cost, which should be improved."
"The user interface is not very intuitive."
"They should integrate the solution with more email services."
"Everything they have should be integrated into one item."
"Some of our customers are facing issues if they've deployed in hybrid mode."
"DLP features are lacking and required because, especially with everyone working from home, security is now paramount when the data is on BYOD devices."
"The configuration on the mobile devices is a little clunky, in terms of setting up the application."
"The solution should be made more user-friendly for technical and business people."
"No good process to import emails from several users into a single comprehensive SP repository."
"The workflow engine cannot support the business needs."
"We do sell Hyland OnBase, which is probably a competitor to SharePoint and does a lot more. In our own organization, we haven't had a need for it, but certainly, for our customers, we are finding that to be a better fit. In terms of the technical reasons for that, I'm not involved much on that side, so I can't give specifics, but there is certainly room for them to improve or add on certain features that clearly are not available in SharePoint, but they are available in Hyland OnBase."
"This solution would benefit from the implementation of enhanced online forms and template development capabilities."
"The initial setup is complex and has room for improvement."
"The initial setup was very complex."
"It is too heavy. MS should not have paid foreign coders dollars per each row of code. They wasted the stability and reliability in the end."
Citrix ShareFile is ranked 9th in Content Collaboration Platforms with 11 reviews while SharePoint is ranked 1st in Enterprise Content Management with 150 reviews. Citrix ShareFile is rated 8.4, while SharePoint is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Citrix ShareFile writes "Flexible plans, stable, and scalable". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SharePoint writes "Good integrations, helps with collaboration, and increases visibility". Citrix ShareFile is most compared with Box, Dropbox, Microsoft OneDrive, Office 365 and Egnyte, whereas SharePoint is most compared with Microsoft OneDrive, Dropbox, WordPress, Box and OpenText Documentum.
We monitor all Content Collaboration Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.