We performed a comparison between ClearSight Analyzer and Wireshark based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Zabbix, Datadog, Auvik and others in Network Monitoring Software."The single dashboard is a valuable feature."
"We can manage the entire system across the network and troubleshoot the pain points."
"What ClearSight will do is it actually maps out the conversation for you."
"Setup is very easy. It's also possible to change source code and compile if you want to change something in the code, because it's free."
"The filter option provided by Wireshark is its most valuable feature...Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."
"What's best about Wireshark is that it doesn't require installation. It supports cards and monitoring permissions and is sufficient for appending and capturing activities. You won't need to install other tools to use Wireshark, so this saves you time. You can capture packets at any time from your laptop through Wireshark."
"I can save the traffic and analysis when I want to. Also, it's especially helpful to follow the stream (TCP, UDP, etc.)."
"Wireshark has a lot of features. It's a powerful tool if you're familiar with it. You can see everything on the network with it."
"The solution is easy to install and use."
"The most valuable feature of Wireshark is the ability to choose a destination of flow that has not been working as expected."
"I have found the most valuable feature you can design your sniffer the way you want to."
"The technical support needs improvement."
"The Wi-Fi side needs improvement."
"I would like to see a multi-user version where you can have a launch platform and, potentially, instead of buying six licenses you buy 12 seats or something like that."
"Wireshark could be improved by adding more monitoring features."
"I wish the filters were a little bit more prepopulated."
"It needs the ability to follow multiple interfaces for specific traffic from different network zones/virtual networks. It would help to understand how any packet is going through the network."
"Wireshark's UI isn't easy to handle and doesn't have as nice a view as Omnipeek."
"A room for improvement in Wireshark is its ease of use for beginners. It could be better. Another room for improvement in the tool is for it to provide more details about the traffic load. At the moment, Wireshark is adequate for me, so there isn't anything I'd like added to it in its next version."
"The solution’s user interface could be improved."
"Its user interface was a little less friendly. They can make its user interface a little bit more friendly. It is for technical people, and most of the technical people would be able to figure it out, but it would be good to improve its user interface. They can maybe build artificial intelligence into it. Currently, it takes a lot of manpower to analyze and dissect all the data."
"The product has been using the same GUI for many years."
More Juniper Mist Premium Analytics Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
ClearSight Analyzer is ranked 98th in Network Monitoring Software while Wireshark is ranked 4th in Network Troubleshooting with 61 reviews. ClearSight Analyzer is rated 10.0, while Wireshark is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of ClearSight Analyzer writes "Shows question being asked, breaks it down and it'll just show you who's not answering". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Wireshark writes "User-friendly with an easy setup and a nice interface". ClearSight Analyzer is most compared with , whereas Wireshark is most compared with Nagios XI, Zabbix, SolarWinds NPM, Colasoft Capsa and Microsoft Network Monitor.
We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
