We performed a comparison between CloverDX Designer and Mule Anypoint Platform based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Informatica, Oracle and others in Data Integration."Its simplicity and the way it handles graphs are the most valuable features."
"Overall, it is a pretty good product. It is also very scalable."
"We are very satisfied with the DevOps support."
"Mule works very well with Salesforce and CRMs."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is a huge list of available connectors for a lot of different platforms, which we can use very easily."
"MuleSoft offers with the Anypoint Platform a unified platform for API management and an integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) as well as an on-premise Enterprise Service Bus pattern."
"When we talk about the APIs, there are multiple policies one can apply on APIs, like rate limiting policies, OWASP policies, and OWASP security policies, that can be easily configured in Mule Anypoint Platform."
"The ability to define multi-tiered APIs and reuse them is a fantastic platform feature."
"The tool is very capable and offers a high performance. The tool supports batch processing and ETL processing."
"If I could give any advice to the guys who are developing it, I would suggest them to really look at the enterprise features, such as being able to log what's going on, being able to capture the current state of processing, and being able to recover from error situations. So, there should be a focus on logging, recoverability, and monitoring. We should be able to monitor what's going on, and in case of any issues, we should be able to recover and restart processing and other things. For scalability and performance, I would probably suggest the Pushdown feature so that you can do the transformation directly on the data source. You do not need to do that calculation within the ETL server. For this, you should be aware of the type of data because each database or kind of storage, such as Hadoop, has its own ANSI standard or language, such as SQL. Microsoft, Oracle, and IBM have their own language. Based on the feedback that I have got, its initial setup takes some time. It could perhaps be simpler."
"The terms of use and how it's priced has become very difficult to manage, which is forcing us to look for alternatives already - and we haven't even been using it for that long just yet."
"There is not much information on the internet...The transforming message is an area in the solution that needs to be improved."
"It doesn't work well when you try using it for the processing layer."
"Pricing is one aspect of the solution that is troublesome. It's too expensive for smaller organizations."
"This becomes an expensive solution over time."
"One area we'd like to see improvement in is the error logging and troubleshooting process."
"The platform's data integration tools need improvement on the processing side."
"The initial setup should be made easy and the documentation should have some guidance."
Earn 20 points
CloverDX Designer is ranked 69th in Data Integration while Mule Anypoint Platform is ranked 2nd in Business-to-Business Middleware with 41 reviews. CloverDX Designer is rated 7.0, while Mule Anypoint Platform is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of CloverDX Designer writes "Simple, stable, and allows us to handle data from various sources, but needs enterprise features for logging, recoverability, and monitoring". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Mule Anypoint Platform writes "Robust, reliable, and stable, ensuring high availability for critical integrations". CloverDX Designer is most compared with , whereas Mule Anypoint Platform is most compared with MuleSoft Composer, Microsoft Azure Logic Apps, SAP Process Orchestration, Oracle Integration Cloud Service and SAP Cloud Platform.
We monitor all Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.