We performed a comparison between CloverETL and Mule Anypoint Platform based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), MuleSoft, Matillion and others in Cloud Data Integration."No dependence on native language and ease of use."
"Server features for scheduler: It is very easy to schedule jobs and monitor them. The interface is easy to use."
"Connectivity to various data sources: The ability to extract data from different data sources gives greater flexibility."
"Key features include wealth of pre-defined components; all components are customizable; descriptive logging, especially for error messages."
"The exchange and API management features are the best in the market."
"This is a good platform for designing, flowing out APIs, and then doing API-based integrations."
"The ability to define multi-tiered APIs and reuse them is a fantastic platform feature."
"The most valuable feature is their integrations and very good API management."
"The most valuable feature of Mule Anypoint Platform is rapid development."
"The integration potential is excellent."
"The most valuable features of the Mule Anypoint Platform are the Flex Gateway, API management, easy-to-use, and connectors. Additionally, they are coming out with improvements to the solution when required."
"MuleSoft Anypoint Platform's most valuable features are its observability and stability."
"Its documentation could be improved."
"Needs: easier automated failure recovery; more, and more intuitive auto-generated/filled-in code for components; easier/more automated sync between CloverETL Designer and CloverETL Server."
"Resource management: We typically run out of heap space, and even the allocation of high heap space does not seem to be enough."
"Price-wise, it is a good product since it is reasonably priced...Mule Anypoint Platform can get too complex for non-technical people."
"Adding connectors for new upcoming applications would add extra value to this product."
"This becomes an expensive solution over time."
"The price could be improved."
"The solution is very expensive. They need to work on the pricing."
"One area we'd like to see improvement in is the error logging and troubleshooting process."
"Code quality, Code Security, SaaS, and DaaS security, can all be improved."
"It should give better control over account management."
Earn 20 points
CloverETL is ranked 60th in Data Integration while Mule Anypoint Platform is ranked 3rd in Cloud Data Integration with 41 reviews. CloverETL is rated 7.0, while Mule Anypoint Platform is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of CloverETL writes "Provides wealth of pre-defined, customizable components, and descriptive logging for errors". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Mule Anypoint Platform writes "Robust, reliable, and stable, ensuring high availability for critical integrations". CloverETL is most compared with SSIS, iWay Universal Adapter Framework and Talend Open Studio, whereas Mule Anypoint Platform is most compared with MuleSoft Composer, Microsoft Azure Logic Apps, SAP Process Orchestration, Oracle Integration Cloud Service and SAP Cloud Platform.
See our list of best Cloud Data Integration vendors.
We monitor all Cloud Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.