We performed a comparison between Comindware Tracker and IBM BPM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It provides a scalable solution that should allow me to grow my company without too much fuss or further set up required."
"I love this software because this software helps me to increase team productivity day-by-day."
"This software added transparency to our workflows. It helped with increasing throughput of clients and their satisfaction."
"The feature I have found most valuable is the easy synchronization with other tools."
"The ability to access Comindware Tracker from mobile has been greatly valuable to our organization. We are often out of office and this can create timeframe and task management issues. Being able to access tasks and time tracking while on the move is a great asset."
"Low code development."
"It was easy to set up my team with access credentials to their files."
"Customize workflow processes visually and interactively."
"Technical support is pleasant to work with and always available."
"Agility is the key. It gives our customers a faster way to be able to implement processes, get ownership of task, visibility into a process. The ability to modify that process, optimize that process over time, is probably the biggest benefit that they get from the software."
"IBM BPM's best features include document sharing, management document creation, widget and barcode creation, and integration."
"The solution is stable."
"We made the transformation to agile. Altogether with BPM, it is the total package."
"The integration and design are valuable features."
"Its dashboard is easy to use and very good. It allows us to customize."
"The Process Designer is good. We like how we can drag and drop and link the processes up, that works out great for us."
"The initial setup seemed a bit complex, and there is no great documentation."
"There are not very many report templates, and if there were more, it would really help."
"We are using the backdated version of this software. That is why we lack of some features. I hope when we update the version, then all the problems will be solved."
"Figuring out how to integrate defined teams or groups into this system is difficult, and there are no contextual menus."
"The OpenAPI is good, but it is not enough. It lacks out-of-box integrations with popular web services."
"The initial setup can be quite slow and finicky."
"This solution lacks API integration with some popular websites."
"I am expecting new updates to improve the software."
"The setup was quite complex because the solution was cutting-edge at that time and IBM invested considerably in the implementation, likely at a loss to themselves."
"Stability wavers. We have some opportunities for improvement in this space, especially as we approach our target volume of a million transactions a day. It is tough, because it is not necessarily the product. It is more around the platform and infrastructure to support it, so the connectivity to the database, web sessions, and reverse proxies in front of that."
"Also, we would like to see integration with artificial intelligence, machine learning-type of technical capabilities. Right now, there are a lot Watson libraries out there. Building those integrations more, out-of-the-box, from IBM would be a good direction."
"They don't have a mechanism to achieve processes, data sources, and data."
"I would like to see the solution be able to interact with other customer software solutions."
"It might not be suitable for entry level clients because it comes with a huge number of modules for processing that at times might not be necessary for upcoming clients."
"From the testing perspective and minor enhancements perspective, customization is something that is a little tedious as compared to new tools. In addition, various open-source tools that are available are not working with IBM BPM."
"The debugging needs improvement. There is some confusion surrounding the debugging."
Earn 20 points
Comindware Tracker is ranked 49th in Business Process Management (BPM) while IBM BPM is ranked 5th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 105 reviews. Comindware Tracker is rated 9.6, while IBM BPM is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Comindware Tracker writes "Easy to navigate and great for keeping everybody in the loop". On the other hand, the top reviewer of IBM BPM writes "Offers good case management and its integration with process design but there's a learning curve". Comindware Tracker is most compared with , whereas IBM BPM is most compared with Camunda, Pega BPM, Appian, IBM Business Automation Workflow and Apache Airflow. See our Comindware Tracker vs. IBM BPM report.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors and best Process Automation vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.