We performed a comparison between Comindware Tracker and OpenText 360 for SharePoint based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The workflow tracker helps us to track our staff's workflow. It helps us to improve the productivity of our team."
"It was easy to set up my team with access credentials to their files."
"This software makes it so easy and enjoyable to work with the team. Any user can learn and start using the application quickly."
"I love this software because this software helps me to increase team productivity day-by-day."
"The feature I have found most valuable is the easy synchronization with other tools."
"The ability to access Comindware Tracker from mobile has been greatly valuable to our organization. We are often out of office and this can create timeframe and task management issues. Being able to access tasks and time tracking while on the move is a great asset."
"Low code development."
"The clean interface, prioritization, and private task lists aren't present in other solutions."
"It has a lot of flexibility, and Microsoft does come up with some new additions from time to time."
"We have manual processes, so the workflow enables us to automate a number of these processes."
"The most valuable feature of OpenText 360 for SharePoint is its performance. The solution is one of the best in the market if you search the internet."
"We concentrate on the legal industry, such as legal libraries. It's the most structured solution we have used and implemented for five years."
"The most valuable features are collaboration, traceability, retention of documents, and search."
"The product has a strong and easy integration with Teams."
"OpenText 360's best features are platform independence and its performance when searching large numbers of documents."
"In terms of its most valuable features, this solution, in general, will provide all you need and it's very convenient to use. We can share our details to collaborative platforms. We can give access to users. It's pretty flexible."
"The initial setup seemed a bit complex, and there is no great documentation."
"The initial setup can be quite slow and finicky."
"The OpenAPI is good, but it is not enough. It lacks out-of-box integrations with popular web services."
"There are not very many report templates, and if there were more, it would really help."
"It would be wonderful to have newer version releases more frequently, but it is quite a minor con."
"If your organization has only a few team members then this tool is not suitable."
"Figuring out how to integrate defined teams or groups into this system is difficult, and there are no contextual menus."
"The UX/UI could be reviewed and revamped to meet new the criteria of Digitalization and Innovation."
"The user interface could definitely be improved."
"An area for improvement would be how the platform handles large volumes of documents. It also doesn't provide a very good, robust backup and restore capacity. In the next release, I would like the search technology to be improved."
"The platform's workflows could be more intuitive and easier to use."
"If I have to really create an internal knowledge management portal, if I have to compare SharePoint and WordPress, WordPress is far, far better in regard to the SharePoint option."
"They need to come with more out of the box solutions, rather than depending on customers to develop them."
"Its licensing needs to be simplified. Currently, its licensing is very complex. It contains a number of pieces, and you have to be an expert in reading all the conditions in the license. They should simplify the licensing and make it easier to understand. It would make a customer's life easier."
"I would like for there to be even more integrations in the next release and I believe that the price could go down a bit."
"OpenText 360 is generally stable, though there are sometimes issues with document size or format."
Earn 20 points
Comindware Tracker is ranked 49th in Business Process Management (BPM) while OpenText 360 for SharePoint is ranked 15th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 13 reviews. Comindware Tracker is rated 9.6, while OpenText 360 for SharePoint is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Comindware Tracker writes "Easy to navigate and great for keeping everybody in the loop". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenText 360 for SharePoint writes "A great, collaborative environment with scalability for many products". Comindware Tracker is most compared with , whereas OpenText 360 for SharePoint is most compared with Apache Airflow, IBM BPM, Bizagi, Adobe Experience Manager (AEM) Forms and IBM Business Automation Workflow. See our Comindware Tracker vs. OpenText 360 for SharePoint report.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
