We performed a comparison between Commvault Cloud and Iron Mountain Connect based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Backup and Recovery solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The data protection itself is very good compared to other products."
"Commvault can perform a backup no matter where you are, and it takes a backup every four hours. No matter when you come to the office, it'll take a backup if you're connected to the internet and check the system for online availability."
"The diversity on offer is very, very good. Everything is supported. It's great."
"The most valuable feature is sharing data sets like they're in a private cloud. We call it our "private cloud" because we can share anything that is inside our backup set with our colleagues or with other people, and yet, everything is still in Belgrade, in Serbia. It's not somewhere else on cloud servers. Everything is in our environment."
"Integration with Active Directory and the Azure platform make it a complete solution."
"It's a software-based solution so we just need a license to expand it."
"The solution includes the best compatibility metrics for integration and they are managed by Google support."
"The features I find most helpful in Commvault are its ability to perform incremental backups and significantly reduce backup times for our diverse multi-architecture, multi-environment environment."
"The most valuable feature for me is the policy management capabilities"
"The navigation of it needs improvement in terms of the UX. The product itself, it works as expected. It's all user experience and user interface improvements that could be made and it could be made a little more consumer-friendly."
"We previously had difficulty with the support being foreign."
"The deployment process should be simplified because it is not something that just anybody can do."
"The tool must improve the 1-Touch recovery of Oracle and Active Directory."
"There could be improvements to the backup failures."
"Our main pain point is that some of our hardware is old. For example, the SSD disks for our application database are slow. It's hard to avoid a slowdown in our environment because the size of our backups is growing every year. If you're growing and don't upgrade the environment, you will see slower backups and restores. You must enhance the environment if you are growing."
"The setup is not that straightforward or easy. Even the documentation is not generic or public like other products. You have to be a partner or you have to have a specific account and download it from the vendor themselves."
"They could work on the implementation of the features."
"I would like to see more integration with different platforms."
Commvault Cloud is ranked 3rd in Backup and Recovery with 104 reviews while Iron Mountain Connect is ranked 39th in Backup and Recovery with 2 reviews. Commvault Cloud is rated 8.6, while Iron Mountain Connect is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Commvault Cloud writes "Provides excellent visibility and helps reduce costs and time". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Iron Mountain Connect writes "Good policies related to data". Commvault Cloud is most compared with Veeam Backup & Replication, Rubrik, Veeam Backup for Microsoft 365, Azure Backup and Zerto, whereas Iron Mountain Connect is most compared with IBM Spectrum Protect, NAKIVO Backup & Replication and Veeam Backup & Replication. See our Commvault Cloud vs. Iron Mountain Connect report.
See our list of best Backup and Recovery vendors.
We monitor all Backup and Recovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
