We compared Tanium and CrowdStrike Falcon based on our user's reviews in several parameters.
Tanium and CrowdStrike Falcon offer robust endpoint security solutions with unique strengths. Tanium provides comprehensive visibility, strong security measures, and powerful analytics capabilities, while praised for its customer service but faces concerns over pricing and performance. On the other hand, CrowdStrike Falcon is commended for its threat detection, reliable protection, and seamless integration, with reasonable pricing and positive ROI, but users call for improvements in user interface, reporting, and integration options.
Features: Tanium's valuable features include comprehensive visibility into endpoints, effective security measures, efficient endpoint management, and powerful analytics. In comparison, CrowdStrike Falcon excels in robust threat detection, advanced machine learning technology, and proactive threat hunting capabilities.
Pricing and ROI: Tanium's setup cost is higher compared to other products in the market, requiring additional resources and time. Users find the licensing complex and require negotiation. On the other hand, CrowdStrike Falcon's setup cost is straightforward and hassle-free, requiring minimal effort. Users appreciate the flexible and customizable licensing options., Tanium's ROI is highlighted by improved efficiency, cost savings, and increased productivity through streamlined IT operations, enhanced security measures, and centralized management. Meanwhile, CrowdStrike Falcon delivers positive results with enhanced cybersecurity capabilities, cost savings, and increased productivity through real-time monitoring and user-friendly interface.
Room for Improvement: Tanium users have highlighted the need for better system performance, improved documentation, and more customization options. In comparison, users of CrowdStrike Falcon have suggested enhancing the user interface, reporting capabilities, integration options, and addressing detection issues and customer support efficiency.
Deployment and customer support: The user reviews show that the duration required to establish a new tech solution varies for both Tanium and CrowdStrike Falcon. Tanium users reported spending three months on deployment and an additional week on setup, while some CrowdStrike Falcon users mentioned needing a week for setup and deployment. It is important to carefully evaluate the context in which these terms are used to determine if they refer to the same period or should be evaluated separately., The customer service for Tanium product is highly praised by users, who appreciate the helpful and responsive assistance provided by the knowledgeable and professional support staff. On the other hand, users also found the customer service for CrowdStrike Falcon to be responsive, knowledgeable, and reliable.
The summary above is based on 60 interviews we conducted recently with Tanium and CrowdStrike Falcon users. To access the review's full transcripts, download our report.
"The solution was relatively easy to deploy."
"We have FortiEDR installed on all our systems. This protects them from any threats."
"The price is low and quite competitive with others."
"The stability is very good."
"The console is easy to read. I also like the scanning part and the ability to move assets from one to the other."
"It is very easy to set up. I would rate my experience with the initial setup a ten out of ten, with ten being very easy to set up."
"I like FortiClient EMS. FortiEDR has a lot of great features like lockdown mode, remote wipes, and encryption. I can set malware outbreak policies and controls for detecting abnormalities. You can also simulate phishing attacks."
"Fortinet FortiEDR's scalability is quite good, and you can add licenses to the solution."
"The solution offers great stability."
"Regarding features, I appreciate its integration capabilities with identity providers...Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."
"I like the dashboard nature of it. Everything is clickable, linkable, and information is easy to obtain and find. How it presents that information is probably the biggest win as far as the information correlation aspect. The presentation of it is very good."
"Since we deployed CrowdStrike, the network has become much calmer, and we now understand the sources of infections, which helps us prevent them from spreading."
"The stability is very good."
"We are now able to find the root cause analysis on any threat. We can figure out where the issue came in versus just dealing with where it is at the moment."
"Easy to use, intelligent, and stable threat detection software."
"Their endpoint is pretty flawless. There is no lag on the machines at all. Even though I have a good overview of all the machines, that's pretty much the most valuable feature of CrowdStrike Falcon."
"Threat hunting is a very good feature on Tanium. We have just started using it and have not used it extensively."
"The product is granular and can build complex roles compared to other EDR vendors."
"Tanium has made the process of detecting threats more proactive with its detection. So, the process is easier and more efficient."
"The security features are very valuable."
"I'm not so familiar with the tool but I like the interaction of the console to the picture. Patching is the primary model I have been focusing on for the last couple of weeks. So I have created a proof of concept environment and have been checking the available features."
"I would say Tanium is the best tool for vulnerability management."
"Tanium’s linear-chain architecture is valuable."
"Tanium's most valuable features are patch management, inventory, and distribution software."
"I would like the solution to extend beyond endpoint protection and include other attack surfaces such as other network components."
"FortiEDR can be improved by providing more detailed reporting."
"To improve Fortinet, we need to see more features and technology areas at the endpoint level introduced."
"The amount of usage, the number of details we get, or the number of options that can be tweaked is limited in comparison to that with other EDR solutions"
"Integration with Azure and SaaS provisioning tools could improve Fortinet FortiEDR."
"The only minor concern is occasional interference with desired programs."
"The EDR console should have more extensive reporting. You shouldn't need to purchase FortiAnalyzer. It should be included in the EDR part. The security adviser cloud platform could be improved with more options for exclusive or intensive rules for devices."
"We've encountered challenges during API deployment, occasionally resulting in unstable environments."
"If CrowdStrike can further expand its support for XDR compatibility, that would give it an edge over all the other competing new products."
"CrowdStrike Falcon sometimes wrongly flags things as malicious. Let's say a user is active on Chrome only. Sometimes, our cross-segmenting will fetch from the backend data and show that it is malicious because of memory or CPU utilization."
"I would rate it an eight out of ten. It does what it needs to do but there's always room for improvement."
"Tighter integration around XDR could be included."
"I would like to see the machine learning feature enhanced."
"For CrowdStrike to work, all the machines need to have an internet connection. This makes it challenging to assist customers without an internet connection. We would like to have a mechanism or relay to make this possible."
"I would love to see more investment in Insight because CrowdStrike have an opportunity to potentially displace some of the vulnerability management vendors with the visibility they can see over time. I want to see them continue to evolve, e.g., what other things can they disrupt which are operational things we have to continue to do as an organization."
"CrowdStrike Falcon could be enhanced by extending its security capabilities to include NDR and XDR."
"Any movement into a SaaS solution has challenges since the processes and data flows are not well defined. Hence, you need to build it at the same time."
"The solution can give a lot of false positives."
"The most painful thing is the interface. It's a bit unclear sometimes."
"The solution lacks mobility."
"Tanium’s scalability could be improved."
"It is not really additional functions, or the features that are needed, rather the complexity would be reduced based on the number of modules required to put together a comprehensive operational security and risk compliance model."
"They could improve the UI."
"Tanium's limitations should be improved because although it is a great tool, it is limited to only a few classes during a session."
CrowdStrike Falcon is ranked 3rd in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) with 107 reviews while Tanium is ranked 36th in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) with 15 reviews. CrowdStrike Falcon is rated 8.8, while Tanium is rated 7.4. The top reviewer of CrowdStrike Falcon writes "Easy to set up with good behavior-based analysis but needs a single-click recovery option". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tanium writes "Useful tool for vulnerability management and deploying applications, needing improvement in its OS upgrade". CrowdStrike Falcon is most compared with Microsoft Defender XDR, Darktrace, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, Trend Micro Deep Security and Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks, whereas Tanium is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, Microsoft Configuration Manager, Qualys VMDR, ServiceNow Discovery and Tenable Security Center. See our CrowdStrike Falcon vs. Tanium report.
See our list of best Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) vendors and best Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vendors.
We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
