CrowdStrike Falcon vs Uptycs comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Microsoft Logo
6,000 views|4,488 comparisons
97% willing to recommend
CrowdStrike Logo
40,231 views|28,871 comparisons
97% willing to recommend
Uptycs Logo
377 views|275 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between CrowdStrike Falcon and Uptycs based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, SentinelOne, CrowdStrike and others in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP).
To learn more, read our detailed Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) Report (Updated: April 2024).
771,170 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"All of the security components are valuable including, antiphishing, antispam, and stage three antivirus.""Having a single pane of glass for all Microsoft security services makes everything much easier. A security analyst can go to a single portal and see everything in one view. The integration of everything into one portal is a huge benefit.""The most valuable features of Microsoft 365 Defender are the combination of all the capabilities and centralized management.""Defender XDR has a feature called the timeline that lets you track all activities. It helps a lot with investigations.""A crucial aspect for our team is the inclusion of identity and access management tools from the vendor.""The attack simulation is excellent; initially, this feature wasn't very robust, but Microsoft improved what we could achieve with it. We can now customize our practice phishing emails and include our company logo, for example. Attack simulation also helps integrate with third-party solutions where applicable and provides an overview of our security architecture through testing. The summary includes areas for improvement in our protection and what steps we need to take to get there.""The EDR and the way it automatically responds to ransomware and other attacks are valuable features.""The most valuable feature of the solution stems from the fact that Microsoft Defender XDR is easy to integrate with other Microsoft platforms or products."

More Microsoft Defender XDR Pros →

"The anomaly detection is the most valuable feature.""As an EDR tool, we can integrate log management and event management. The solution deals with threats automatically, that's the advantage.""The features we showcase to potential customers are prevention, malware protection, zero-day protection, and application scripting. Vulnerability assessment is another valuable feature.""The CS falcon agent is a lightweight agent compared with other agents of EDR products.""The features I like the most are the response time and the dashboard are both excellent.""I like the Overwatch feature the most.""The detection is very effective.""The most valuable feature is that we don't need to re-image machines as much as we had to."

More CrowdStrike Falcon Pros →

"They have multiple great features."

More Uptycs Pros →

Cons
"The patching capability should be there. Patching is something that you cannot do even though you see the vulnerabilities present in your environment. For patching, you have to depend on another solution.""Improving scalability, especially for very large tenants, could be beneficial for Microsoft Defender XDR.""In the beginning, it's difficult to navigate the system because it is quite large. Just trying to find your way and understand how the system works can be hard. After spending quite a lot of time searching it's a lot easier, but I wish it were a bit more user-friendly when you're trying to find things.""The support team is not competent or responsive.""The capability to not only thwart attacks but also to adapt to evolving threats is crucial.""When we do investigations, it would be better if Microsoft could populate the host dashboard more. When we open any host for investigation, we want the entire timeline of what is happening on the host, including all the users logging in, their hardware, Windows version, etc.""The interface could be improved. For example, if you want to do a phishing simulation for your employees, it can take a while to figure out what to do. The interface is a bit messy and could be updated. It isn't too bad, but doing some things can be a long process.""The mobile app support for Android and iOS is difficult and needs improvement."

More Microsoft Defender XDR Cons →

"It would be nice if they did have some sort of Active Directory tie-in, whether that be Azure or on-prem. Sometimes, it is difficult for us to determine if we are missing any endpoints or servers in CrowdStrike. We honestly don't have a great inventory, but it would be nice if CrowdStrike had a way to say this is everything in your environment, Active Directory-wise, and this is what doesn't have sensors. They try to do that now with a function that they have built-in, but I have been unsuccessful in having it help us identify what needs a sensor. So, better visibility of what doesn't have a sensor in our environment would be helpful.""The malware analysis could be improved, as that's what we use the solution for the most and that change would make it a better EDR tool.""Tighter integration around XDR could be included.""I would love to see more investment in Insight because CrowdStrike have an opportunity to potentially displace some of the vulnerability management vendors with the visibility they can see over time. I want to see them continue to evolve, e.g., what other things can they disrupt which are operational things we have to continue to do as an organization.""The product could be more accurate in terms of performance.""An improvement would be to extend support to legacy and unsupported servers.""This solution is relatively expensive.""They don't really have anything when it comes to scanning attachments."

More CrowdStrike Falcon Cons →

"We end up facing a lot of issues after upgrades."

More Uptycs Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The solutions price is fair for what they offer."
  • "The price could be better. Normally, the costs depend on the country you're located in for the license. When we were in the initial stage, we went with the E5 license they call premium standard. It cost us around $5.20 per month for four users."
  • "The price of the solution is high compared to others and we have lost some customers because of it."
  • "Microsoft is not competitive with the pricing of the solution. The competitors are able to offer lower discounts. The price of the solution is higher."
  • "We have a lot of problems in Latin America regarding the price of Microsoft 365 Defender, because the relationship between dollars and the money of the different countries, it's is a lot. Many customers that have small businesses say that they would like the solution but it is too expensive. However, large companies do not find the cost an issue."
  • "The most valuable licensing option is expensive, so pricing could be improved. Licensing options for this solution also need to be consolidated, because they frequently change."
  • "Microsoft should provide lower-level licensing options. They should do it in such a way that even an individual could purchase a license, and it should be entirely flexible."
  • "They have moved from a licensing model to pay-per-use... The question is: What happens if, for any reason, there's not enough budget to accept this model? That could be a great problem."
  • More Microsoft Defender XDR Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "The pricing will depend upon your volume of usage."
  • "I would like them to further reduce the price, because it is quite pricey at the moment."
  • "Purchasing the product through the AWS Marketplace is just a click away. Since we were using the on-premise version of the product, we continued on the cloud by purchasing it through the AWS Marketplace."
  • "I do not have experience with the cost or licensing of the product."
  • "The other administrator and I can log in to check the exact details of what happened, what was running, and what caused the detection. We know exactly what was happening on the end users PC and we can tell if it's something that we actually need or something that's malicious."
  • "We are at about $60,000 per year."
  • "This solution has a very competitive price."
  • "Our company pays approximately US$ 65,000 annually for 900 machines."
  • More CrowdStrike Falcon Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) solutions are best for your needs.
    771,170 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The integration, visibility, vulnerability management, and device identification are valuable.
    Top Answer:There is the cost of the license, and there is the cost of implementation services. Only by enabling a license for your… more »
    Top Answer:The web filtering solution needs to be improved because currently, it is very simple. It is very important. Integrations… more »
    Top Answer:Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. CrowdStrike Falcon Both Cortex XDR and Crowd Strike Falcon offer cloud-based solutions that… more »
    Top Answer:Both of these products perform similarly and have many outstanding attributes CrowdStrike Falcon offers an amazing… more »
    Top Answer:The CrowdStrike solution delivers a lot of information about incidents. It has a very light sensor that will never push… more »
    Top Answer:They have multiple great features.
    Top Answer:The pricing is moderate compared to other products in the market. However, it is not the cheapest option. Depending on… more »
    Top Answer:The one thing missing is the IPS part, the blocking part. We end up facing a lot of issues after upgrades.
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Microsoft 365 Defender, Microsoft Threat Protection, MS 365 Defender
    CrowdStrike Falcon, CrowdStrike Falcon XDR
    Learn More
    Uptycs
    Video Not Available
    Overview

    Microsoft Defender XDR is a comprehensive security solution designed to protect against threats in the Microsoft 365 environment. 

    It offers robust security measures, comprehensive threat detection capabilities, and an efficient incident response system. With seamless integration with other Microsoft products and a user-friendly interface, it simplifies security management tasks. 

    Users have found it effective in detecting and preventing various types of attacks, such as phishing attempts, malware infections, and data breaches.

    Watch the Microsoft demo video here: Microsoft Defender XDR demo video.

    CrowdStrike Falcon offers advanced threat detection, real-time visibility, easy interface, and responsive customer support. It enhances workflow and efficiency, promotes collaboration, streamlines processes, and boosts productivity. With features like incident response options, customizable alerts, and proactive threat hunting, it helps protect organizations from malware and ransomware attacks.

    Uptycs is the first unified CNAPP and XDR platform.

    Your developer’s laptop is just a hop away from cloud infrastructure. Attackers don’t think in silos, so why would you have siloed solutions protecting public cloud, private cloud, containers, laptops, and servers?

    Uptycs combines multiple security measures into one easy-to-use system, eliminating the need for multiple tools and reducing the risk of cyber attacks. With Uptycs, you can automate security and connect insights across your enterprise. Uptycs ties together threat activity across on-prem and cloud boundaries, delivering a more cohesive enterprise-wide security posture. With Uptycs security teams can reduce operating costs, deployment times, and security failures.

    Shift up with Uptycs.

    Key benefits:

    • Unified platform: Uptycs provides a single platform to cover various security needs, from laptops to cloud environments, reducing complexity and the need for multiple tools.
    • Reduced risk: The platform helps prioritize responses to threats, vulnerabilities, misconfigurations, sensitive data exposure, and compliance mandates, leading to a more cohesive enterprise-wide security posture.
    • Improved decision-making: Uptycs helps users make better risk decisions by providing insights from a large volume and variety of security and IT data, without relying on black boxes.
    • Coverage of modern attack surfaces: The platform protects digital assets across heterogeneous infrastructure, including hybrid cloud, containers, laptops, and servers, using standardized telemetry and open standards.
    • Comprehensive security capabilities: Uptycs offers various security features, including CNAPP, XDR, CWPP, KSPM, CSPM, CIEM, CDR, threat detection, investigation and forensics, remediation and blocking, and additional security controls.
    • Enhanced Kubernetes and container security: Uptycs provides complete visibility and control over Kubernetes and container environments, including asset inventory, compliance, vulnerabilities, and threat detection.
    • Extended Detection and Response (XDR): The platform offers industry-leading XDR for endpoint protection, detection, and investigation, correlated with signals from other environments, for macOS, Windows, and Linux endpoints.
    • Threat Detection and Response: Uptycs analyzes system telemetry in real-time to detect threats and provides context to help analysts quickly triage and investigate detections.
    • Scalability: The platform is designed to accommodate growing security needs and adapt to future cybersecurity challenges.
    • Improved visibility and control: Uptycs offers comprehensive visibility and control across various cloud environments, workloads, and deployments, helping security teams identify and prioritize risks effectively.
    Sample Customers
    Accenture, Deloitte, ExxonMobil, General Electric, IBM, Johnson & Johnson and many others.
    Information Not Available
    Comcast, Crossbeam, Flexport, Greenlight Financial, Lookout Security, PayNearMe
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Manufacturing Company18%
    Financial Services Firm13%
    Computer Software Company13%
    Government10%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company17%
    Financial Services Firm10%
    Government8%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company19%
    Financial Services Firm15%
    Manufacturing Company9%
    Comms Service Provider7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company15%
    Financial Services Firm10%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Government7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company36%
    Financial Services Firm10%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    Non Profit6%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business42%
    Midsize Enterprise22%
    Large Enterprise36%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business26%
    Midsize Enterprise17%
    Large Enterprise57%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business32%
    Midsize Enterprise22%
    Large Enterprise46%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business25%
    Midsize Enterprise18%
    Large Enterprise56%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business43%
    Midsize Enterprise10%
    Large Enterprise47%
    Buyer's Guide
    Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, SentinelOne, CrowdStrike and others in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP). Updated: April 2024.
    771,170 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    CrowdStrike Falcon is ranked 3rd in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) with 107 reviews while Uptycs is ranked 51st in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) with 1 review. CrowdStrike Falcon is rated 8.8, while Uptycs is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of CrowdStrike Falcon writes "Easy to set up with good behavior-based analysis but needs a single-click recovery option". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Uptycs writes "Great features, good support, and lots of functionality". CrowdStrike Falcon is most compared with Darktrace, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, Trend Micro Deep Security, Trend Vision One and SentinelOne Singularity Complete, whereas Uptycs is most compared with Aqua Cloud Security Platform, Wiz, Orca Security and Lacework.

    See our list of best Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) vendors, best Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vendors, and best Extended Detection and Response (XDR) vendors.

    We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.