We performed a comparison between CucumberStudio and GitHub CoPilot based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Rapid Application Development Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."CucumberStudio has a very user-friendly interface."
"The best thing is that a person without knowledge about the program can easily understand what happened in our testing process."
"The data table that helps in converting a single script to multiple test cases is very helpful."
"GitHub CoPilot has good stability and performance."
"The document generation features are valuable."
"The product is easy to integrate."
"Initially, OpenAI is free, but you'll need to pay for it later."
"The product's most valuable feature is vulnerability management features."
"The initial setup of the product is easy."
"The product's initial setup is straightforward because it's pushed through the updates."
"GitHub CoPilot helps us auto-complete code. The tool's context awareness benefits our projects because it identifies the context in which we are working and automatically proposes solutions that we use."
"The reporting needs to be improved."
"I think it would be better if we could also do the reporting with CucumberStudio."
"I would like to see better customer support."
"Some of the suggestions provided by GitHub CoPilot are not accurate, making it an area of concern where improvements are required."
"The suggestions provided by the product must be improved."
"The solution is expensive. It should also support other programming languages."
"The product's price is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"The tool needs to focus on integration, as it is the most important aspect. I would like to see some pre-designed modules included in my projects."
"In certain instances, OpenAI didn't respond in the expected way. The responses were more general and didn't address the specific point."
"GitHub CoPilot's stability is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"In a few cases, the results aren't correct, so that needs improvement. Also, it would be great if the results could be presented in different formats, not just text. As engineers, it takes time to read through text-based results."
CucumberStudio is ranked 28th in Rapid Application Development Software with 9 reviews while GitHub CoPilot is ranked 15th in Rapid Application Development Software with 11 reviews. CucumberStudio is rated 8.0, while GitHub CoPilot is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of CucumberStudio writes "An easy -to -use scalable cloud-based solution which needs some improvement with programming automation and stability". On the other hand, the top reviewer of GitHub CoPilot writes "Though it offers good integration features, the price needs to be lowered". CucumberStudio is most compared with , whereas GitHub CoPilot is most compared with GitLab, Oracle Application Express (APEX), Pega BPM and ServiceNow. See our CucumberStudio vs. GitHub CoPilot report.
See our list of best Rapid Application Development Software vendors.
We monitor all Rapid Application Development Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
