We performed a comparison between CyberArk Privileged Access Manager and Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about CyberArk, Delinea, BeyondTrust and others in Privileged Access Management (PAM)."Provides improved security around having your credentials locked down and rotated regularly."
"We are able to rotate credentials and have privileged account access."
"CyberArk has helped us to identify, store, protect, and monitor the usage of privileged accounts."
"I really like the PTA (Privileged Threat Analytics). I find this the best feature."
"CyberArk has been easy for us to implement and the adoption has been good. We've been able to standardize a bunch of things. We've been able to standardize relatively easily with the use of the platforms and managing the policies."
"We have been able to manage application credentials in CyberArk, whether they come as a custom plugin or straight out-of-the-box."
"The flexibility of integrating with other technologies is important because of a lot of applications - a lot of COTS products - are not supported when we are bringing the application IDs. The CyberArk platform provides a lot of opportunities to do customization."
"We are able to know who is accessing what and when; having accountability."
"The ability to provide just-in-time privileged access and set specific parameters for access duration is highly beneficial."
"CyberArk has a lot on the privileged access side but they have to concentrate more on the application side as well."
"The one place where we found that this product really needs to improve is the cloud. Simple integrations don't exist, even today. We don't have anything specific on CyberArk for managing, SaaS products, SaaS vendors, SaaS credentials. I understand it's a vendor-based thing and that they have to coordinate with the other vendors to be able to do that, and there are integrations coming. But these are the major places where CyberArk definitely needs to invest some more time."
"I would like to see better automation in granting access, better tools, more efficient tools, to be able to customize the solution that CyberArk provides."
"There is a bit of a learning curve, but it's a pretty complex solution."
"Make it easier to deploy."
"Integration with the ticketing system should allow any number of fields to be used for validation before allowing a user to be evaluated and able to access a server."
"Online help needs to be looked into with live agent support."
"I would like to see is the policy export and import. When we expend, we do not want to just hand do a policy."
"There's room for improvement in Microsoft's documentation, as it often lacks clarity."
More CyberArk Privileged Access Manager Pricing and Cost Advice →
CyberArk Privileged Access Manager is ranked 1st in Privileged Access Management (PAM) with 144 reviews while Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management is ranked 12th in Privileged Access Management (PAM) with 1 review. CyberArk Privileged Access Manager is rated 8.8, while Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of CyberArk Privileged Access Manager writes "Lets you ensure relevant, compliant access in good time and with an audit trail, yet lacks clarity on MITRE ATT&CK". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management writes "Enhanced security and simplified management offering a centralized solution with granular settings". CyberArk Privileged Access Manager is most compared with Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine), Microsoft Entra ID, Delinea Secret Server, WALLIX Bastion and One Identity Safeguard, whereas Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management is most compared with Delinea Privileged Access Service and Delinea Secret Server.
See our list of best Privileged Access Management (PAM) vendors.
We monitor all Privileged Access Management (PAM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.