We performed a comparison between CyberArk Privileged Access Manager and senhasegura Access Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about CyberArk, Delinea, BeyondTrust and others in Privileged Access Management (PAM)."CyberArk has allowed us to get the credentials and passwords out of hard-coded property files."
"When we started with RPA, there was a requirement that every credential and the bots themselves be protected through the PAM system. From the get-go, we've had CyberArk in the middle... We've got a pretty robust RPA implementation with our PAM platform. Users, bots, the credentials — everything is managed via our PAM solution."
"I find value in notifications from CyberArk when passwords fail verification and have other issues."
"The ability to develop and deploy applications with no stored secrets is very valuable."
"Right off the bat, the most valuable feature is the DNA scan. It gives us the ability to scan our environment and find the accounts that we're going to need to take under control."
"The most valuable aspects of the solution include password management and Rest API retrieval of vaulted credentials."
"The technical support for this solution is very good. If I was to rate it on a scale of one to five, I would give it a five."
"We have been able to manage application credentials in CyberArk, whether they come as a custom plugin or straight out-of-the-box."
"Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."
"Areas the product could be improved are in some of the reporting capabilities and how the reports are configured."
"It should be easy to use for non-technical people. Its interface can be a bit difficult. Some parts of its interface are not very intuitive. Some of the controls are hidden, and instead of having a screen with all the controls for that account on it, you have to use menus and other similar things."
"New functionalities and discovered bugs take longer to patch. We would greatly appreciate quicker development of security patches and bug corrections."
"The product could be easier to use. More work needs to be done on this aspect; it is not good enough yet. It also takes up a lot of server space. Sometimes we need to use up to seven servers."
"Over the past seven years, I have seen a lot of ups and downs with the product."
"It's hard to find competent resellers/support."
"Initially, there was a lot of hiccups, because there were a lot of transitions due to manual installations."
"This is probably a common thing, but they do ask for a lot of log files, a lot of information. They ask you to provide a lot of information to them before they're willing to give you anything at all upfront. It would be better if they were a little more give-and-take upfront: "Why don't you try these couple of things while we take your log files and stuff and go research them?" A little bit of that might be more helpful."
"In Linux credential discovery was a bit hard, but after Senhasegura's latest update, it is much easier."
More CyberArk Privileged Access Manager Pricing and Cost Advice →
CyberArk Privileged Access Manager is ranked 1st in Privileged Access Management (PAM) with 144 reviews while senhasegura Access Management is ranked 14th in Privileged Access Management (PAM) with 1 review. CyberArk Privileged Access Manager is rated 8.8, while senhasegura Access Management is rated 10.0. The top reviewer of CyberArk Privileged Access Manager writes "Lets you ensure relevant, compliant access in good time and with an audit trail, yet lacks clarity on MITRE ATT&CK". On the other hand, the top reviewer of senhasegura Access Management writes "With a great support team and stability, the tool also offers scalability to its users". CyberArk Privileged Access Manager is most compared with Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine), Microsoft Entra ID, Delinea Secret Server, WALLIX Bastion and One Identity Safeguard, whereas senhasegura Access Management is most compared with ManageEngine PAM360.
See our list of best Privileged Access Management (PAM) vendors.
We monitor all Privileged Access Management (PAM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.