We performed a comparison between DarwinBox and Dayforce HCM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Cloud HCM solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."In our company, we use DarwinBox to maintain the data of our employees and for recruitment purposes."
"The solution that we used previously was very complex. As a result, without referring to the manuals and consulting an expert, it was difficult for a newly hired employee to navigate the platform. However, this is not the case with Darwinbox. It has a very intuitive user interface, and anyone can use it and implement it without having to use a guide or a walk through process. It's very simple."
"The most valuable features of the solution are organogram and position-based mapping."
"The integrated time clock has provided efficiencies in payroll, as we no longer have to decipher handwritten time sheets and input them into the system."
"The fact that the time and attendance system is built into the HRIS is very valuable because, in the past, we had to use two different systems."
"We have been able to automate many of our manual processes."
"Statutory holiday pay is calculated automatically."
"Great time and attendance payroll and benefits administration which has improved our efficiency."
"I have not encountered many bugs, and in the rare instances where problems occurred, Ceridian Dayforce HCM promptly fixed them. Stability-wise, I rate the solution a nine out of ten."
"The solution's payroll portion is very streamlined."
"The implementation was through a team assigned to us by Ceridian. They were extremely knowledgeable and it made the implementation go very smoothly."
"DarwinBox is not a stable solution...DarwinBox is not a scalable solution."
"The solution's API integration with third-party applications should be improved."
"Like most software, it has a base version, the vanilla, out-of-the-box version, and customization is required to match it to the unique processes of each company. The Darwinbox team seems to be having difficulty with the customization process. They have to be a little more mature to customize it as per every company's need."
"The solution's initial setup was difficult. Also, the solution's initial deployment took around six months."
"The reporting could be improved."
"The solution's dashboards and geofencing could be improved."
"One area to be improved is the solution's reporting function, which can be cumbersome."
"Management and reporting of the GL costing could be improved."
"I would like to continue to see improvements in the Recruiting module. I would like to see this module interact with Calendars, such as Outlook, etc."
"I would also like to see some improvement in standard reports. A standard report should be available to pull the required information for Affirmative Action Plans. I do not think I should have to build or create one."
"The solution has a lot of glitches."
DarwinBox is ranked 16th in Cloud HCM with 3 reviews while Dayforce HCM is ranked 6th in Cloud HCM with 14 reviews. DarwinBox is rated 6.4, while Dayforce HCM is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of DarwinBox writes "The product's servers, integration capabilities, and user interface needs improvement". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Dayforce HCM writes "Greatly improved our efficiency with its integrated time and attendance module". DarwinBox is most compared with SAP SuccessFactors, ZingHR, PeopleStrong , Workday and inFeedo, whereas Dayforce HCM is most compared with Workday, SAP SuccessFactors, UKG and Oracle HCM Cloud. See our DarwinBox vs. Dayforce HCM report.
See our list of best Cloud HCM vendors and best Talent Management vendors.
We monitor all Cloud HCM reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
