We performed a comparison between Docker and Legit Security based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Software Supply Chain Security solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The initial setup was easy, and you are only required to run commands."
"When used in conjunction with Kubernetes, it is seamless because it integrates very well."
"Docker packages up an application as a single item that you can then run without the need to install or configure it to work on any specific machine."
"The solution is easy to deploy for clients so it saves a lot of hassle."
"The deployment is quite fast, which is beneficial."
"The scalability of Docker is good."
"It is neat and very flexible."
"The most valuable features of Docker are its security, detailed documentation, and ease of use, and the Docker Swarm is not as complex as Kubernetes."
"We implemented Legit Security to gain visibility into all development teams and ensure that consistent controls are in place and accounted for on every route."
"Legit has had a positive effect on our overall security posture."
"The true value proposition of Legit lies not in its features but in its ability to support our product security program's focus on creating guardrails instead of toll gates."
"Legit has increased my security posture to a level I couldn't achieve before. I don't need to worry as much about what's happening within my developer environments. I can rest assured that my vulnerabilities are being detected."
"Marketing of Docker is one area that needs to improve."
"The Kubernetes blocks need improvement since Docker has many holes in it."
"We would like to see improvement in adding the node into the Docker Swarm cluster, as at present it is a little tricky and requires a lot of manual steps."
"The runtime and security could improve in Docker. Security is paramount in the cloud and important."
"The product does not have an extensive documentation. The tool does not have good scenarios. We have to go through the GitHub repository and investigate similar scenarios. Also, if you are copying multiple things, then you can jeopardize the copy number. The copying aspect also lacks a UI part. We also need to limit the memory."
"The solution’s documentation could improve a bit."
"Docker could improve by having security vulnerability reports."
"The documentation could be improved."
"One issue is that engineering teams don't always embed secrets in the same way, making it difficult for the tool to consistently identify them."
"Legit Security could do a little better with detecting publicly exposed keys. It's not bad. The detections that they are running get to everything eventually, but it would be great if they could increase some of that awareness."
"I would like them to have their own static code scanner, and I'd like them to have their own open-source software scanners."
"The one we're working on right now is the ability to dynamically rerun development teams and groups."
Docker is ranked 5th in Software Supply Chain Security with 40 reviews while Legit Security is ranked 7th in Software Supply Chain Security with 4 reviews. Docker is rated 8.6, while Legit Security is rated 10.0. The top reviewer of Docker writes "Easy to deploy with an impressive networking feature". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Legit Security writes "Correlates information based on the integrations I have, which is extremely helpful". Docker is most compared with Mirantis Container Runtime, Rancher Labs, VMware Tanzu Mission Control and Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE, whereas Legit Security is most compared with Snyk, Ox Security, Cycode and Cider. See our Docker vs. Legit Security report.
See our list of best Software Supply Chain Security vendors.
We monitor all Software Supply Chain Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
