We performed a comparison between Falcon LogScale and Splunk Enterprise Security based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Splunk, Wazuh, Datadog and others in Log Management."It offers the capability to view live log ingestion directly from the console which means you can seamlessly manage live log data ingestion alongside accessing and analyzing older data from the past."
"The reporting aspect is good and it does what I need it to do."
"The solution helped reduce our alert volume."
"We have found all the features useful. However, the dashboarding and logging have been very helpful. Additionally, the log analysis does a great job."
"The solution's most valuable feature is the dashboard, which allows us to see everything on the same page and provides easy visibility into problems."
"The ability to ingest any data and display it in a way that anyone can understand."
"Splunk has improved our operations by giving us access to more information and allowing us to deploy more use cases."
"Splunk's schema on demand is incredibly useful. I do not have to worry about what my users will need when we onboard their data."
"Splunk's visualizations make it easy for users to understand the data."
"There are some overlapping features found in multiple tools."
"There is a learning curve in order to start using machine learning. We have been trying to do it for three years, and we have not managed anything. It is too complex."
"This is not really a monitoring solution."
"I feel as though a major focus of upcoming releases should be set on Machine Learning, Predictive Analytics, and I would enjoy to see more security focused add-ons and apps developed by the vendor."
"Its performance can be better. Sometimes, it takes longer when we do queries."
"It is a good product, but the Achilles heel for a lot of organizations is the cost model for it because it gets expensive. That's because the model is based on how much data it processes a day, which can be prohibitive, especially if you have a lot of data. A lot of customers may not be ready for the sticker shock on how to fully leverage the product. I realized that the reason for that is that when it was originally designed, it was kind of like a big data modeling application. If they want to have a bigger customer base, they can come out with subsets of their product that are focused on specific things and have different pricing models. It may help with the cost."
"Search head clustering is often temperamental in its current state and should be improved, replaced by something better, or be reverted to search head pooling."
"Splunk's implementation process for managing multiple indexes can be complex, especially when dealing with a large number of components."
"While scheduled reports can be embedded, Splunk dashboard can not be embedded directly without enabling cross origin."
Falcon LogScale is ranked 34th in Log Management with 1 review while Splunk Enterprise Security is ranked 1st in Log Management with 246 reviews. Falcon LogScale is rated 9.0, while Splunk Enterprise Security is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Falcon LogScale writes "A highly commendable and robust solution offering powerful features and comprehensive log data management". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Splunk Enterprise Security writes "It has a drag-and-drop interface, so you don't need to know SQL or Java to construct a query ". Falcon LogScale is most compared with Elastic Stack, Grafana Loki, LogRhythm SIEM, Exabeam Fusion SIEM and Sumo Logic Security, whereas Splunk Enterprise Security is most compared with Wazuh, Dynatrace, IBM Security QRadar, Elastic Security and Microsoft Sentinel.
See our list of best Log Management vendors.
We monitor all Log Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.