We performed a comparison between FlutterFlow and Microsoft Power Apps based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Low-Code Development Platforms solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."FlutterFlow offers a lot, but one feature that really helps me is the debugging features that allow me to test everything on the spot. This is really helpful."
"The most valuable features of FlutterFlow are the integrations and workflows."
"Ability to generate QR codes and scan barcodes."
"Overall the solution is reliable."
"The most valuable feature of Microsoft PowerApps is the user interface."
"If you want something that you can use for cellphones, multiple tablets, and things like that, you can use PowerApps for the front end. It gathers all the information, and the information goes somewhere else."
"The most valuable feature is the simple data connectivity components."
"Creating a PowerApp is very easy. All I do is link and share the result with my colleagues. Deployment is very fast."
"There are a lot of different applications; you can connect PowerApps, or Flow, or Power BI to many different types of applications to interchange data."
"The solution becomes easier the set up once you get used to it."
"The UI components could be more standardized. Sometimes, for certain properties, I have to search more than I do with other platforms. With other platforms, once you know one, you know all. But with FlutterFlow, sometimes you have to look around for what you need."
"There is room for improvement in advanced functionality so it could cater to more complex app development needs."
"Microsoft PowerApps can be more costly for small teams or organizations."
"Technical support could be faster, and more accurate."
"Improvements to the capturing of geographic locations and integration with maps would raise my score of the product from seven point five to its maximum of ten."
"The solution should move to the next step in its maturity model and include mobile versions for Android and iOS."
"In terms of workflow automation, I believe that capabilities for creating the entire business process are required, or, at the very least, the option to model the business process, define complex business events, handle them, and route them to appropriate business stakeholders."
"You can't add too many filters onto anything you build, otherwise, it will be very slow and it will affect your performance."
"I have always felt that you need an IT background to use this solution."
"Microsoft is not cheap. The pricing could be lowered for their customers."
FlutterFlow is ranked 17th in Low-Code Development Platforms with 2 reviews while Microsoft Power Apps is ranked 1st in Low-Code Development Platforms with 78 reviews. FlutterFlow is rated 8.6, while Microsoft Power Apps is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of FlutterFlow writes "Simplifies integrations, accelerates development timelines, and offers a good MVP". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft Power Apps writes "Low-code, low learning curve, and reduces manpower". FlutterFlow is most compared with Mendix, whereas Microsoft Power Apps is most compared with Oracle Application Express (APEX), Mendix, ServiceNow, Appian and HCL Domino. See our FlutterFlow vs. Microsoft Power Apps report.
See our list of best Low-Code Development Platforms vendors.
We monitor all Low-Code Development Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.