We compared Fortinet FortiGate and Sangfor NGAF based on our user's reviews in several parameters.
Fortinet FortiGate and Sangfor NGAF both offer strong security measures and reliable performance, with Fortinet FortiGate excelling in customer service and support, while Sangfor NGAF boasts affordability and efficiency in threat detection. Fortinet FortiGate users appreciate its comprehensive reporting functionalities and cost savings, while Sangfor NGAF users value its ease of integration and network protection. Areas of improvement include the complexity of Fortinet FortiGate's user interface and Sangfor NGAF's need for better documentation and technical support.
Features: Fortinet FortiGate stands out for its strong security measures, effective firewall capabilities, intuitive interface, reliable performance, and comprehensive reporting functionalities. In comparison, Sangfor NGAF offers advanced security measures, ease of integration, robust network protection, efficient threat detection, and a user-friendly interface.
Pricing and ROI: The setup costs differ between Fortinet FortiGate and Sangfor NGAF. Users find the setup cost for Fortinet FortiGate to be minimal and straightforward, allowing for easy deployment. Sangfor NGAF also has a reasonable setup cost with a straightforward licensing process., Comparing ROI, Fortinet FortiGate is praised for effectiveness, robust features, ease of use, and cost savings. Sangfor NGAF improves security, efficiency, and reduces costs with user-friendly interface and comprehensive features.
Room for Improvement: Fortinet FortiGate has room for improvement in its complex user interface, challenging setup process, performance issues, and occasional downtime. Sangfor NGAF would benefit from enhancements in user interface, documentation, technical support, advanced features, and customization options.
Deployment and customer support: Based on the user reviews, both Fortinet FortiGate and Sangfor NGAF have similar durations for deployment and setup phases. The reviews suggest that these timeframes should be considered together unless they refer to the same period., Fortinet FortiGate exhibits strong customer service and support, with prompt and effective assistance. Technical issues are efficiently resolved, highlighting the reliability of their customer service. Sangfor NGAF also offers prompt and helpful support, with knowledgeable and professional staff addressing queries and issues efficiently. Both products provide satisfactory customer service.
The summary above is based on 132 interviews we conducted recently with Fortinet FortiGate and Sangfor NGAF users. To access the review's full transcripts, download our report.
"What's most important is the ease of use."
"I have found Fortinet FortiGate to be scalable."
"The web filtering facility and application control are the most valuable features from the point of view of our clients. The VPN feature is also quite popular amongst our clients. Two-factor authentication is one of the good features in Fortinet. These features are important for the current scenario of security. Security has become a necessity nowadays. With cyber-attacks becoming more common, protecting an organization's data is one of the major tasks. It is also very stable and scalable, and it is very straightforward to configure. Their technical support is also good."
"The UTM feature is quite good. FortiAP is easy to deploy because both Fortigate and FortiAP are under the same brand. Otherwise, you need to do more work on the configuration."
"This solution made it very easy to manage our bandwidth."
"The SD-WAN is the most valuable feature."
"It is user friendly, and has all the features you need."
"Fortigate is very scalable to serve our customers' needs. We have scaled already from fifty to more than a hundred instances of Fortinet FortiGate. Around 20 staff are required for deployment and maintenance, mostly engineers."
"Sangfor NGAF's standout feature is its powerful application control, enabling precise restrictions on mobile user access to approved applications."
"It offers application control features."
"It's a very simple to use product."
"The absolute best part of Sangfor NGAF is their support. It's a 24/7 support channel, and the last time I requested their assistance I got a reply within three minutes. They helped solve the problem immediately."
"While the features are not dissimilar to other brands, configuration is much more simple, which works out great for Indonesian people."
"The price versus value is good because the solution is less expensive than Sophos, Fortinet, or SonicWall."
"Sangfor NGAF specializes in ransomware detection and helps to protect our network from ransomware threats and malware."
"The level of support provided to local companies is good. They transform their application control and other settings according to that country."
"They need to improve their technical support."
"Fortinet FortiGate can improve by integrating the web application firewall and the DDoS protection part of the solution. Having a WAF feature, web application firewall, and proxy together would be a good benefit."
"The ease of use could be improved."
"The reporting in Fortinet FortiGate could improve. Customers are having to purchase additional reporting components. When I have used the Sophos solution it is a complete solution, in Fortinet FortiGate you have to use additional tools to have the features needed."
"When we cluster the two Fortinet FortiGate boxes together we have some issues."
"The stability could be a bit better."
"Web security solutions can be improved."
"There is one big configuration file with no separations for the unique VDOMs. Maybe they could separate individual VDOM configuration files with the root VDOM configuration file referencing the individual VDOM config files."
"The tool is expensive."
"They need to improve their research team and they need to study their data to analyze it and build the product."
"Sangfor could improve their interface capacity on the 5100 series model and upgrade their hardware from one gig to 10 gig. This would improve the overall throughput."
"Occasional issues with breaches which are dealt with expediently."
"The GUI needs to be improved, lacks logic in some areas."
"The web interface needs to be improved, making it more user-friendly."
"An area of improvement for Sangfor NGAF could be in the field of reporting and logging."
"Lacks consistency in terms of filtering certain websites and applications."
Fortinet FortiGate is ranked 2nd in Firewalls with 306 reviews while Sangfor NGAF is ranked 20th in Firewalls with 31 reviews. Fortinet FortiGate is rated 8.4, while Sangfor NGAF is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Fortinet FortiGate writes "It's a reliable solution that's easy to install and cheaper than competitors ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Sangfor NGAF writes "Affordable, easy to configure firewall with fast, responsive support". Fortinet FortiGate is most compared with Sophos XG, Cisco Secure Firewall, Netgate pfSense, Meraki MX and Fortinet FortiGate-VM, whereas Sangfor NGAF is most compared with Sophos XG, Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls, Netgate pfSense, Check Point NGFW and Fortinet FortiOS. See our Fortinet FortiGate vs. Sangfor NGAF report.
See our list of best Firewalls vendors.
We monitor all Firewalls reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
