We performed a comparison between Fortinet FortiSIEM and NetCrunch based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Splunk, Microsoft, Wazuh and others in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)."Easy alert setup which enables different alerts in different categories."
"The event correlation is pretty robust. The GUI is pretty good."
"Some of our customers who use this solution have seen improvement in their connection with load balancing on both connections."
"FortiSIEM provides a single PIN to monitor SOC and NOC. It's a nice tool for integration and monitoring. It provides multiple categories for monitoring based on security designations like low, medium, and high."
"FortiSIEM's log correlation is good."
"Fortinet FortiSIEM provides good detection against advanced threats."
"To add workers and even collectors is pretty easy."
"There are things like dashboards and reports (pre-configured and custom) that let me know that things are operating the way they should be, and when they are not."
"Reporting on NetCrunch is pretty good. It's very similar to SolarWinds. It's just a different interface. The majority of everything there was beneficial."
"FortiSIEM is not a market leader in the SIEM space."
"The biggest thing that could be better is a quicker response to support cases."
"It lacks a "wizard" that shows a particular user's activity or particular circumstance. I think the interface is intimidating because there's so much information there."
"Areas for improvement would be the ease of use and the integration with Fortinet's own products."
"Their technical support is horrible. By horrible, I mean a train wreck of a disaster that has fallen off a bridge and caught fire."
"The stability of the product is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"The support of the product changed recently, and I don't think it's for the better. They should work to improve the support they offer to clients."
"It's difficult to integrate unsupported devices with FortiSIEM compared to QRadar. It's easier to integrate and develop processes in QRadar. It's harder to develop a custom process in FortiSIEM."
"I didn't care for the role-based, permission-based options, which were not the best."
Earn 20 points
Fortinet FortiSIEM is ranked 9th in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) with 65 reviews while NetCrunch is ranked 77th in Network Monitoring Software. Fortinet FortiSIEM is rated 7.6, while NetCrunch is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Fortinet FortiSIEM writes "It's cheaper than other solutions with the same features but lacks integration with many third-party vendors". On the other hand, the top reviewer of NetCrunch writes "A network monitoring platform with a useful reporting feature, but permission-based options could be better". Fortinet FortiSIEM is most compared with IBM Security QRadar, Splunk Enterprise Security, Microsoft Sentinel, Wazuh and LogRhythm SIEM, whereas NetCrunch is most compared with Zabbix and PRTG Network Monitor.
We monitor all Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
