We performed a comparison between GitLab and Incredibuild based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about GitLab, Jenkins, Amazon Web Services (AWS) and others in Build Automation."A user friendly solution."
"The solution makes the CI/CD pipelines easy to execute."
"The most valuable feature of GitLab is the automatic merging of code."
"GitLab is a solution for source code management, container registry, pipelines, testing, and deployment."
"CI/CD is valuable for me."
"It speeds up our development, it's faster, safer, and more convenient."
"The important feature is the entire process of versioning source code maintenance and easy deployment. It is a necessity for the CI/CD pipeline."
"GitLab is very useful for pipelines, continuous integration, and continuous deployment. It is also stable."
"It is saving time for developers, which is saving money for the company."
"Their RBAC is role-based access, which is fine but not very good."
"GitLab can improve by integrating with more tools, such as servers with Docker."
"I believe there's room for improvement in the advanced features, particularly in enhancing the pipeline functionalities."
"Even if I say I want some improvement, they will say it is already planned in the first quarter, second quarter, or third quarter. That said, most everything is quite improved already, and they're improving even further still."
"We would like to have easier tutorials. Their tutorials are too technical for a user to understand. They should be more detailed but less technical."
"We'd always like to see better pricing on the product."
"GitLab could improve the patch repository. It does not have support for Conan patch version regions. Additionally, better support for Kubernetes deployment is needed as part of the package."
"It's more related to the supporting layer of features, such as issue management and issue tracking. We tend to always use, for example, Jira next to it. That doesn't mean that GitLab should build something similar to Jira because that will always have its place, but they could grow a bit in those kinds of supporting features. I see some, for example, covering ITSM on a DevOps team level, and that's one of the things that I and my current client would find really helpful. It's understandably not going to be their main focus and their core, and whenever you are with a company that needs a bit more advanced features on that specific topic, you're probably still going to integrate with another tool like Jira Service Management, for example. However, some basic features on things like that could be really helpful."
"Stability could be improved. I don't know the reason for the instability because there are no logs that help me to understand the problem."
Earn 20 points
GitLab is ranked 1st in Build Automation with 70 reviews while Incredibuild is ranked 20th in Build Automation. GitLab is rated 8.6, while Incredibuild is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of GitLab writes "Powerful, mature, and easy to set up and manage". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Incredibuild writes "Saves time for developers, which saves money for the company". GitLab is most compared with Microsoft Azure DevOps, SonarQube, Bamboo, AWS CodePipeline and Tekton, whereas Incredibuild is most compared with Bazel and TeamCity.
See our list of best Build Automation vendors.
We monitor all Build Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.