We performed a comparison between Google Kubernetes Engine and HPE Ezmeral Container Platform based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Red Hat, Amazon Web Services (AWS), VMware and others in Container Management."The main advantage of GKE is that it is a managed service. This means that Google is responsible for managing the master node in the Kubernetes cluster system. As a result, we can focus on deploying applications to the slaves, while Google handles any updates and security patches. The fact that GKE is fully integrated into the Google ecosystem, including solutions such as BigQuery and VertexAI. This makes it easier for us to integrate these tools into our process. This integration ultimately speeds up our time to market and reduces the time and effort spent on managing infrastructure. The managed aspect of GKE allows us to simply deploy and utilize it without having to worry about the technicalities of infrastructure management."
"The solution is available across AWS, GCP and Azure and is seamless."
"The initial setup is very easy. We can create our cluster using the command line, or using our console."
"I am impressed with the product's output scaling."
"Stability-wise, this solution is really good."
"The scalability is the best feature."
"The feature that I like the most is the ease of use as compared to AWS. Its ease of use is very high, and I can quickly deploy clusters with a simple template."
"We appreciate that it is quite easy to set up a Kubernetes cluster in Google Cloud, using the managed services within this solution."
"If customers focus on primary apps or if they are using them for data science, this is a good solution."
"The user interface could be improved."
"The product’s visible allocation feature needs improvement."
"The tool's configuration features need improvement."
"It needs to support load balancing."
"The product's stability is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"The notifications are not informative."
"I would like the solution to integrate with another Kubernetes product. I would also like it to monitor other platforms. It needs to also include scale-up container in the tool's next release."
"An area in which Google Kubernetes Engine could improve is configuration."
"The modernization in Ezmeral could be improved."
Google Kubernetes Engine is ranked 9th in Container Management with 32 reviews while HPE Ezmeral Container Platform is ranked 17th in Container Management. Google Kubernetes Engine is rated 8.0, while HPE Ezmeral Container Platform is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of Google Kubernetes Engine writes "The auto-scaling feature helps during peak hours, but the support is not great". On the other hand, the top reviewer of HPE Ezmeral Container Platform writes "Easy to install with good support, but the deployment of applications could be simplified". Google Kubernetes Engine is most compared with Linode, Kubernetes, Rancher Labs, Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform and Illumio, whereas HPE Ezmeral Container Platform is most compared with Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform, Kubernetes, Amazon EKS, VMware Tanzu Mission Control and Docker.
See our list of best Container Management vendors.
We monitor all Container Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
