We performed a comparison between Hyland OnBase and Microsoft Power Apps based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Low-Code Development Platforms solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The retention module is one of the most valuable features. Whatever we scan onto the system can be identified and we are notified when the records are due to be disposed."
"The most valuable features are that it's very secure and provides audit trails for our documents."
"The solution is very developed and we are not taking full advantage of its functionalities."
"We found the setup process to be okay since they do offer a troubleshooting guide."
"OnBase is a remarkable tool. It is a well-done product. Hyland has a lot of experience in building it and looking for new things for clients in terms of functionalities. It has amazing stability, and it can grow horizontally and vertically. It is built for growth. Their technical support is also quite good and available throughout the year."
"I like the cloud and its integrability."
"The most valuable feature is the completeness of the concept. It is not restricted by where you are allowed to use it and that is its greatest strength."
"For our purposes, it is quite scalable."
"As a business person, I design a lot of screens. The solution really resonates with me. Their design is amazing."
"I like the containerization of Azure."
"I would say that the most valuable features are the user interface, navigation, and business routes."
"Of all of the solutions I evaluated, it was the easiest to use and deploy."
"The solution becomes easier the set up once you get used to it."
"When compared with Microsoft Power Automate, it is a bit more mature, and we're able to build things pretty rapidly."
"We are struggling with duplicates and would like to have OCR functionality when using this solution."
"An area for improvement would be the training - getting our people up to speed on how to use it required more training than we expected due to the complexity of the solution."
"The look and feel could be better. The integration with the user could be better. It could also be more user-friendly."
"The dashboards do have some room for improvement as compared to the other vendors which are there in the market."
"For user experience, they would have to do more with the interface. It is not easy to work with and is a little messy. It is getting better, but it is not yet good enough. Other products are comparatively doing better in terms of the user interface. I have been hearing about Box, which is very easy to use and learn for the users. OnBase has to work on this aspect. It should have BPM capabilities. We compete with tools that provide the BPM feature and support those standards. They can do better in terms of the pricing model. It is a really expensive tool in Latin America. They should have different prices for different regions."
"We need to troubleshoot why our reports didn't get downloaded in a day. There is a workflow feature which powerful but also complicated."
"One of the major problems with it is what PowerApps calls the delegation warning. Regardless of what platform, data source, et cetera, that you're using, you can't retrieve more than 2000 records."
"Microsoft PowerApps could improve the speed of Power Automate, it is not very fast."
"It's easy to use."
"The flexibility and the user interface need improvement."
"PowerApps can't do a lot of things that users need now. For example, it can't handle signatures."
"The solution should have more integration with other platforms."
"This tool doesn't have an internal database. It only relies on the data layer of Microsoft Cloud."
"It's sometimes hard to import groups of options. At this point, I need to enter those manually and it slows the process down."
Hyland OnBase is ranked 21st in Low-Code Development Platforms with 8 reviews while Microsoft Power Apps is ranked 1st in Low-Code Development Platforms with 78 reviews. Hyland OnBase is rated 8.0, while Microsoft Power Apps is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Hyland OnBase writes "Stable content and workflow management solution with a valuable retention module". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft Power Apps writes "Low-code, low learning curve, and reduces manpower". Hyland OnBase is most compared with Alfresco, SharePoint, OpenText Documentum, IBM FileNet and DocuWare, whereas Microsoft Power Apps is most compared with Oracle Application Express (APEX), Mendix, ServiceNow, Appian and Microsoft Azure App Service. See our Hyland OnBase vs. Microsoft Power Apps report.
See our list of best Low-Code Development Platforms vendors.
We monitor all Low-Code Development Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
