We performed a comparison between IBM Guardium Vulnerability Assessment and Qualys VMDR based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Tenable, Wiz, SentinelOne and others in Vulnerability Management."It helped with some of the regulatory requirements. It also helped with some of the security analytics and analysis. It was worthwhile from that perspective."
"The most valuable feature is that it provides a simple English recommendation on actions that you need to take once a vulnerability is discovered."
"The reporting features are good and there are many built-in reports that can be quickly configured."
"Great web application security for scanning."
"The prioritization feature is great. I think it has all of the advanced features that we need."
"Technical support is fantastic."
"Qualys VM has allowed us to know the vulnerabilities we need to prioritize based on the threat levels and the possible impact if there's an intrusion."
"The solution is easy to use."
"There are fewer false positives when using this solution."
"The vulnerability management feature is what I used the most. It is a good SaaS product. It is easy to use. It has a nice UI where you can see all the assets and vulnerabilities."
"It is very easy to use and there are lots of options. We can usually easily go through it and all of the things we want to configure, and we can configure everything to our specifications very easily."
"The interface could be improved by having sub-groups of tests, ultimately making the process of collecting tests faster."
"Building policies is not that easy. There are some things that are turned off by default, for example, displaying values."
"It was not as easy to use. The user-friendliness of it was somewhat lower than what I was expecting. It was also lacking in terms of the ease of the setup. There should be an automatic agent for deployment."
"When tested on Zero day, there were errors."
"Improve the API speed."
"Qualys VMDR is basically susceptible to false positives, and false negatives."
"Endpoint stability and fault resolution could be improved."
"It is more expensive vs. other products on the market."
"Qualys VM's vulnerability scan could be improved, especially the number of CVE numbers it can manage at a time."
"There needs to be better documentation."
"We are moving away from Qualys to Defender ATP because I find that Defender ATP is much better at prioritizing the vulnerabilities that I should be looking at."
More IBM Guardium Vulnerability Assessment Pricing and Cost Advice →
IBM Guardium Vulnerability Assessment is ranked 41st in Vulnerability Management with 3 reviews while Qualys VMDR is ranked 3rd in Risk-Based Vulnerability Management with 77 reviews. IBM Guardium Vulnerability Assessment is rated 6.6, while Qualys VMDR is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of IBM Guardium Vulnerability Assessment writes "Worthwhile from the regulatory requirements and analytics perspective, but is expensive and not easy to use". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Qualys VMDR writes "Good visibility but expensive and needs better support". IBM Guardium Vulnerability Assessment is most compared with Tenable Nessus, Rapid7 InsightVM, Orca Security and Acunetix, whereas Qualys VMDR is most compared with Tenable Nessus, Tenable Security Center, Rapid7 InsightVM, Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management and Tenable Vulnerability Management.
We monitor all Vulnerability Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.