We performed a comparison between IBM Guardium Vulnerability Assessment and Rapid7 InsightVM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Tenable, Wiz, SentinelOne and others in Vulnerability Management."It helped with some of the regulatory requirements. It also helped with some of the security analytics and analysis. It was worthwhile from that perspective."
"The most valuable feature is that it provides a simple English recommendation on actions that you need to take once a vulnerability is discovered."
"The reporting features are good and there are many built-in reports that can be quickly configured."
"The risk score that they provide makes it easier to find out the biggest risks. It helped the security officers to understand where the biggest risks are so that they can act on them. They can instruct their IT teams to give them a higher priority and mitigate them."
"The most valuable feature is the site scanning, where we can provide a complete subnet and what it is we need to scan on those devices."
"The ease of deployment and configuration allows users to onboard quickly."
"One of the most valuable features is it's graphical dashboard feature. It is quite easy to manage the widgets, and we can customize those according to our queries."
"The most valuable features of Rapid7 InsightVM are the accurate level of scanning and the workflows are good."
"The main functionality of identifying item endpoints that weren't properly patched or had vulnerabilities is the solution's most valuable feature."
"I rate InsightVM eight out of 10 for ease of setup. It takes two or three engineers to deploy. The solution requires some maintenance. It's mainly cleaning up data."
"I really love the new platform. It is really easy to understand, use, and deploy."
"Building policies is not that easy. There are some things that are turned off by default, for example, displaying values."
"The interface could be improved by having sub-groups of tests, ultimately making the process of collecting tests faster."
"It was not as easy to use. The user-friendliness of it was somewhat lower than what I was expecting. It was also lacking in terms of the ease of the setup. There should be an automatic agent for deployment."
"All products have room for increased security and Rapid7 InsightVM is no exception."
"The team needs to improve the speed and focus on the new bandwidth feed. Sometimes, it takes a while to scan, especially with new updates."
"This solution creates false-positives which can cause issues with reporting."
"The solution needs to improve its vulnerability design to include CVC results."
"There have been instances where technical support takes a long time to update the status of a ticket, which is something that can be improved."
"There should be containerization within the VM."
"We'd like the agent to cover more compliance issues."
"There needs to be much clearer instructions surrounding scanning."
More IBM Guardium Vulnerability Assessment Pricing and Cost Advice →
IBM Guardium Vulnerability Assessment is ranked 41st in Vulnerability Management with 3 reviews while Rapid7 InsightVM is ranked 4th in Risk-Based Vulnerability Management with 55 reviews. IBM Guardium Vulnerability Assessment is rated 6.6, while Rapid7 InsightVM is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of IBM Guardium Vulnerability Assessment writes "Worthwhile from the regulatory requirements and analytics perspective, but is expensive and not easy to use". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Rapid7 InsightVM writes "You can scan a network, and receive recommendations to address vulnerabilities with the click of a button". IBM Guardium Vulnerability Assessment is most compared with Tenable Nessus, Qualys VMDR, Orca Security and Acunetix, whereas Rapid7 InsightVM is most compared with Tenable Nessus, Qualys VMDR, Tenable Security Center, Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management and Wiz.
We monitor all Vulnerability Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.