We performed a comparison between IBM Integration Bus and JBoss ESB based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, MuleSoft, Software AG and others in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB)."The most valuable feature is the API integration."
"It is very straightforward. It is very user-friendly integration."
"The most valuable feature is that it's robust and its time to market is very short."
"The system's stability is the most valuable feature."
"The interface is quite stable."
"I recommend it for large enterprises but only for specific use cases. You need to have a relatively mature integration practice in your organization to leverage its capabilities fully."
"The product is usually very easy to deploy."
"The solution addresses all of our middleware needs in respect of transformation, parsing, security and stability; everything really."
"The solution is very easy to use. I can download the trial version and just give it a go."
"I don't mind the pricing."
"Current aggregation implementation should be deprecated. MQ independent, as well as an intuitive solution, should be proposed."
"The solution needs to improve it's security and its proactive notification of security issues."
"Its integration with Cloud Pak components could be better."
"Session management can sometimes hand forcing server reboots."
"The product lacks an integrated testing module."
"It needs improvement in terms of technical support as well as in terms of integration of data mining. I am not convinced about many things in this solution, such as the conversion of the DFDL or copybook file, which is the conversion from a text file to XML. It is very complex. They should also provide more information about this solution in the IBM Knowledge Center. I can get a lot of information from the IBM Knowledge Center about DataStage, but I don't get that much information about IBM Integration Bus. There is hardly any information even on the internet and various channels such as YouTube. They can provide good step-by-step documentation based on a company's requirements. It would be really helpful. My company is mainly looking for data mining and communicating with multiple servers. IBM Integration Bus is good for communicating with multiple servers, but it needs improvement for XML conversion and data mining. We have a lot of old systems that use XML."
"The memory footprint should be minimized."
"The EPA, from what I understand, lacks a lot of features and it doesn't really know how to interface with legacy systems or how to develop APIs for legacy systems."
Earn 20 points
IBM Integration Bus is ranked 1st in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) with 64 reviews while JBoss ESB is ranked 14th in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB). IBM Integration Bus is rated 8.0, while JBoss ESB is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of IBM Integration Bus writes "Scalable solution with efficient integration features". On the other hand, the top reviewer of JBoss ESB writes "Easy to use with flexible pricing, but needs more flexibility surrounding integrations". IBM Integration Bus is most compared with Mule ESB, webMethods Integration Server, IBM WebSphere Message Broker, Oracle Service Bus and SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite, whereas JBoss ESB is most compared with Mule ESB, Red Hat Fuse, Oracle Service Bus and webMethods Integration Server.
See our list of best Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.