We performed a comparison between IBM Integration Bus and Oracle Service Bus based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It can be implemented as an enterprise service bus to seamlessly connect all applications within your enterprise."
"The most valuable thing is the loose coupling and making the change in only one stack of the ESB layer or the middleware layer."
"REST API design and development support are useful. Building and exposing APIs using GUI API designer with editor makes implementation a breeze."
"One of the most valuable features is how seamless and easy to use this solution is. This is a fantastic solution and a very measured product."
"The interface is quite stable."
"I use the integration of Kafka and the message flow, which is really good. It is also good for moving any file from one location to another. Using IBM Integration Bus in the data stage is pretty simple. You can see the preview and other things. The MQ server integrated with IBM Integration Bus is really great. I don't have to do a lot of configuration from that side. It is really good."
"Promotes the reuse of developed resources to more efficiently consume resources."
"IBM Integration Bus is a very strong tool."
"It is stable."
"It is lightweight and one can easily integrate with different applications, databases, JMS, or web services through different protocols."
"Monitoring feature that allows tracking of the web's UI development."
"The solution is quite stable overall. We haven't witnessed any performance issues so far."
"With Oracle Service Bus, we can connect with different types of systems. Another feature I like the most is the security feature."
"I am a part of the software developing team and I mainly use this solution for the integrating applications."
"Its ease of use is valuable. It's very easy to use. It's no code/low code. Oracle Middleware products are also rich in adapters."
"I like the ease of deployment and the ease of implementation."
"The product does not provide API management."
"Its licensing or subscription model should be improved for more flexible adoption. There should also be more ease of use."
"Technical support is something that should be better."
"IBM could improve its connectivity."
"We used a third-party vendor, who help us install the solution and it was not easy."
"The user interface could be improved in a future release."
"I would like to see more metered rest and API support. IBM is already working on it on Version 11, but it still needs improvement."
"IBM Integration Bus could improve by having a more lightweight installation. Additionally, automation could improve."
"This solution would benefit from having more cloud-based adapters."
"We have faced a problem with the heap memory side, but that is stable now."
"An area for improvement in Oracle Service Bus is the roadmap for its product launch. Currently, it's unclear, so Oracle should develop a roadmap for version 12c, so people can see what's coming out of that version of Oracle Service Bus. Cloud hosting is an additional feature I'd like to see in the next release of Oracle Service Bus."
"There is significant room for improvement in the monitoring capabilities."
"The support for GraphQL needs to be improved, and the response time for global support could be faster."
"It needs to support more adapters, because the integration points keep changing and new things keep coming up. It also needs to be more scalable."
"Security features can be improved to better protect the server."
"What needs improvement in Oracle Service Bus is the connectivity between adapters such as the Salesforce adapter and database adapters. The limited number of adapters compatible with Oracle Service Bus makes you want to switch to a different solution."
IBM Integration Bus is ranked 1st in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) with 64 reviews while Oracle Service Bus is ranked 5th in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) with 25 reviews. IBM Integration Bus is rated 8.0, while Oracle Service Bus is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of IBM Integration Bus writes "Scalable solution with efficient integration features". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Service Bus writes "Enables us to do a lot of aggregation and routing, but API response can be a problem if the payload is heavy". IBM Integration Bus is most compared with Mule ESB, webMethods Integration Server, IBM WebSphere Message Broker, IBM DataPower Gateway and Red Hat Fuse, whereas Oracle Service Bus is most compared with Mule ESB, webMethods Integration Server, Red Hat Fuse, WSO2 Enterprise Integrator and TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus. See our IBM Integration Bus vs. Oracle Service Bus report.
See our list of best Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.