We performed a comparison between IBM DevOps Test UI and Visual Studio Test Professional based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Functional Testing Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."IBM Rational Functional Tester is very contextual."
"The most valuable feature is the UI component tester."
"Test automation is most valuable because it saves a lot of time."
"It is compatible with all sorts of Dark Net applications. Its coverage is very good."
"It is a good and user-friendly tool."
"The product is good to create big or small projects fastly. It is one of the leaders in the area."
"The solution is very stable; there's nothing in relation to stability to complain about."
"What I like most about Visual Studio Test Professional is the way people publish templates and publish integration."
"You can easily write code, test, and deploy within the same environment. It is a mature tool. It regularly receives new updates and versions. In my opinion, it's one of the best products by Microsoft for developers."
"Visual Studio Test Professional's most valuable feature is the rich IDE for doing code and test development."
"Visual Studio is highly powerful. It's probably the best software development tool on the market."
"Visual Studio Test Professional is a scalable solution."
"They need to do a complete revamp so that even a non-technical person can manage the tool."
"As many of our products are moving from PC to mobile, the most important thing that this solution needs is mobile app support."
"If the solution is running on Linux, there are some issues around application compatibility."
"The latest version has increased load time before testing can be run."
"In Visual Studio we still don't have anything which can pinpoint memory leaks on a certain code line."
"The solution should be cheaper."
"Visual Studio Test Professional could improve by having better integration with external databases."
"The performance could be faster."
"The product must provide more integration."
"Visual Studio Test Professional should include more automation."
"There are too many features with the product and I would like there to be less."
"The documents on the Microsoft website are not very useful, and they ought to make it easier to find answers."
More Visual Studio Test Professional Pricing and Cost Advice →
IBM DevOps Test UI is ranked 22nd in Functional Testing Tools with 8 reviews while Visual Studio Test Professional is ranked 6th in Functional Testing Tools with 48 reviews. IBM DevOps Test UI is rated 7.2, while Visual Studio Test Professional is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of IBM DevOps Test UI writes "Reliable test automation, and test data creation with efficient support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Visual Studio Test Professional writes "Customization is a key feature as is the ability to integrate with third-party services ". IBM DevOps Test UI is most compared with Katalon Studio, Tricentis Tosca, Selenium HQ, HCL OneTest and Worksoft Certify, whereas Visual Studio Test Professional is most compared with TFS, Apache JMeter, Tricentis NeoLoad, SmartBear TestComplete and Tricentis Tosca. See our IBM DevOps Test UI vs. Visual Studio Test Professional report.
See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors and best Regression Testing Tools vendors.
We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.