We performed a comparison between Tricentis NeoLoad and Visual Studio Test Professional based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Apache, OpenText, Tricentis and others in Performance Testing Tools."The most valuable feature is flexibility, as it connects to all of the endpoints that we need it to."
"The most valuable feature of Tricentis NeoLoad for us has been its ability to easily monitor all the load generators and configure the dynamics and data rates. Additionally, we can monitor individual loads and data directly within NeoLoad without needing third-party tools."
"The stability is okay."
"I like the scripting and parameterization features."
"The test cases are quite easy to build and to maintain. This is the most valuable aspect of the solution for us. It's the reason why they changed from JMeter to NeoLoad."
"NeoLoad is best tool for testing in production without making many changes to the script or solution."
"I like the solution’s performance and integration. Also, the tool’s help center is very responsive and helpful. They have always helped me within a short duration of time."
"From a functional perspective, the range of tools provided with Tricentis NeoLoad is perhaps the widest."
"The most valuable feature has been to store all our packages in one place including SSIS packages, SQL tables, TFS and SSR."
"The most valuable feature is the in-built support for C# and .NET projects."
"Its initial setup process is easy."
"It is very easy to use. You can handle a lot of things together at once in one package, which is a good point for us."
"It is a good and user-friendly tool."
"What I like most about Visual Studio Test Professional is the way people publish templates and publish integration."
"The most valuable features are tools like IntelliSense and ReSharper."
"One of the best documentation in the world."
"I didn't like much of the support that you get from the Tricentis group unless it was after it integrated with Tricentis; the support is not that good."
"It needs improvement with post-production."
"The product is expensive."
"We would like NeoLoad to be able to support more protocols. Testing can also be a little tricky at times."
"In future releases, it would be good if extra added features for integration are added into NeoLoad."
"An area for improvement in Tricentis NeoLoad is its price, as it has a hefty price tag."
"The UI lacks sufficient object rendering."
"The solution’s pricing is higher compared to other tools. Though the product’s reports are accurate, it needs to be more detailed like other tools."
"Visual Studio Test Professional could improve by having better integration with external databases."
"We would like to be able to easily integrate this solution with our continuous integration tools, such as Jenkins."
"Visual Studio Test Professional is a little pricey."
"One of the problems with this solution is you need to be highly technically skilled to operate it, it is not for everyone."
"The interface should be made attractive."
"The solution can improve the startup time."
"It needs more integration with other tools for monitoring. Microsoft also needs to make it more modern to make it work with microservices and the cloud. It is a bit outdated currently."
"I would like to see more integration in the solution."
More Visual Studio Test Professional Pricing and Cost Advice →
Tricentis NeoLoad is ranked 3rd in Performance Testing Tools with 61 reviews while Visual Studio Test Professional is ranked 7th in Functional Testing Tools with 46 reviews. Tricentis NeoLoad is rated 8.2, while Visual Studio Test Professional is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Tricentis NeoLoad writes " Maintenance will be easy, pretty straightforward to learn and flexible". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Visual Studio Test Professional writes "Customization is a key feature as is the ability to integrate with third-party services ". Tricentis NeoLoad is most compared with Apache JMeter, OpenText LoadRunner Professional, OpenText LoadRunner Cloud, Tricentis Tosca and k6 Open Source, whereas Visual Studio Test Professional is most compared with TFS, Apache JMeter, SmartBear TestComplete, TestRail and Tricentis Tosca.
We monitor all Performance Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
