We performed a comparison between IIS and Oracle SOA Suite based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Application Infrastructure solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It's good and offers good usability."
"The solution is very simple to use and easy to deploy."
"The product is stable."
"This is definitely a stable solution."
"Stability-wise, I rate the solution a nine out of ten...Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a nine out of ten."
"IIS is scalable."
"The solution is easy to use and connects with Microsoft."
"The interface, simplicity, and ease of management are all good features that make this user-friendly."
"Valuable features include connectors and BAM."
"The product allows you to visualize how a company is working currently by providing rich possibilities for analysis such as the audit trails and therefore shows where improvements might be valuable."
"The most valuable feature of the facility, as the partner link, is to try to use third-party services and logic in your own vehicle to orchestrate the information."
"Conceptually, how it integrates a lot of essential enterprise process components. That's the most valuable."
"Middleware jobs developing for EC, ERP, and shipping systems become easier."
"Enables our Product Manager to post products to different outside EC platforms with only one interface and one process."
"The stability of the solution is the most valuable feature."
"It performs better in real-time transactions."
"Finding different settings can be difficult if you don't know where to look."
"The solution's scalability needs improvement."
"At the moment, we have big problems with stability, and I'm not very happy at the moment. So, the stability could be improved."
"Performance-wise, certain improvements in IIS are needed...IIS is not scalable. Its scalability is less."
"I would like to see NLB features in IIS."
"The product could be more compatible with Linux and macOS, particularly when applying user configuration policies."
"The graphical user interface has room for improvement and can be more user-friendly."
"IIS could improve by Microsoft Windows improving the update services. We would like to be able to update all systems that are connected. The WSA service has to be in good order to accomplish this."
"The installation and adjustment process seems too complex."
"The Maven integration in JDeveloper is very basic and might be enhanced to allow the proper use of Maven."
"One area that could be better is the human task feature. It could be improved to provide more functionality and customization options because it has limited options available."
"Various parts of SOA, BPEL, and so on, each have their own consoles which need to be accessed individually with different logins. It would be better from an admin perspective if all the consoles were accessible via a single login."
"It's also not developer-friendly."
"The technical support is good, we have premier support which costs extra."
"Decrease the number of internal resources which the product uses."
"Other solutions might be better componets such as Salesforce."
IIS is ranked 1st in Application Infrastructure with 53 reviews while Oracle SOA Suite is ranked 8th in Application Infrastructure with 65 reviews. IIS is rated 8.0, while Oracle SOA Suite is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of IIS writes " A simple and easy-to-use solution but not recommended for public apps". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle SOA Suite writes "Easy to setup, provides good support and scalable solution ". IIS is most compared with NGINX Plus, Apache Web Server, Oracle WebLogic Server, Tomcat and JBoss, whereas Oracle SOA Suite is most compared with Mule ESB, WebLogic Suite, Apache Web Server, TIBCO ActiveMatrix and Microsoft .NET Framework. See our IIS vs. Oracle SOA Suite report.
See our list of best Application Infrastructure vendors.
We monitor all Application Infrastructure reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
