INTELLIBOT vs Pega Robotic Process Automation comparison

"It is a stable product. We have been using it for 15 months now, and there have been no issues."

"The replay of the automation is an awesome feature."

"I have found the most valuable feature to be the straightforward visual editor, it has close to no code required. It allowed us to deploy the email monitoring in this couple of weeks."

"The return on investment is pretty good because the license cost is cheaper than other RPA tools in the market."

"This solution is easy to use and requires little coding knowledge."

"For machine learning, there is an in-built document and text classification feature in INTELLIBOT. That is unlike other RPA tools where one needs to procure a separate license. Besides this, the application is easy to use. One valuable feature is the drag-and-drop feature for AI and email intelligence. It is easier than using UiPath's IQ bot."

"There's a helpful community available through the portal."

"The most valuable aspect for myself was access to the .net framework. If I couldn't figure something out using the objects that they had provided, I could bring in the .net objects and do so using similar logic that I would in a .net or C sharp coding language. Having that familiarity was helpful."

"The initial setup is pretty easy and quite fast."

"Pega is very mature. It's very old. They have grown with time, and they have learned. Other robotic process automation solutions are basically focused on only doing the automation, whereas Pega also gives you a workflow system so that you can create a workflow."

"The tech support is highly available and there is plenty of online training available."

"It was very smooth and very seamless to create automations."

"Using the tool actually ends up teaching you about making workflows more efficient."

"The most valuable features are the loops to lookup tables to read the data."

"Pega Robotics offers all the required features to build end-to-end process automation like any other similar tools. It's unique development style using data line and control flow line makes it easy to debug through the flow."

"A couple of times, we noticed that some bugs caused the bot to go in the wrong flow."

"Has limited functionality and uses extensive resources."

"I would like to see the cognitive marketing platform improved."

"The first pain point of INTELLIBOT was with the development. Whenever the company developed any command, they published it directly onto their SQL site, and our current automation got auto-updated. The second pain point was with the action set. It could be stronger. Moreover, if I am doing UiPath automation, I have to do it with the Internal Report for now."

"The solution is heavily dependant on scripts, such as JavaScript or any other external script that needs to be a part of the system. If they want to grow, the scripting dependency should go away. They should have built-in libraries to pull in work from."

"The trigger actions need to be more robust."

"Currently, there are not many documents available on Google that explain each activity and how to use it or how to use the parameters and pass values."

"You cannot use a two-dimensional array to read the data."

"The orchestration needs to be better."

"In Pega, the UI has to be improved because that is the most challenging area that most of our customers ask for because we have to depend on some other React JS or some other tool to bring that kind of UI experience. So, there is a lot of room for improvement in terms of UI and UX."

"It is still a niche skill and resources are scarce in the market unless big IT companies are involved."

"Excel connectors need to be improved as there are a few connectors in Excel areas."

"There have been some scenarios where the bot was not able to replace some of the controls and could not recognize and personalize the task we wanted to automate."

"The ease-of-use could be improved."

"In this modern world, in this automation space, if Pega could provide more options that are user-friendly and provide a way to quickly develop an automation solution that is drag-and-drop with a minimal coding approach, then it would be great for automation."

"The solution requires a license and we purchased one annually. We were satisfied with the price."

"It is quite cheap. In the year 2019, it was $1000 for a year."

"INTELLIBOT with the DPA costs approximately $1,500 USD."

"At the time, one license was $5,000 USD. If we needed to negotiate for more licenses, we could negotiate a bit on the price."

"The licensing cost is too high."

"In terms of Pega Robotic Process Automation pricing, I would rate it a five out of five because the solution has a good price. Pricing is not very high, though I'm unsure of the exact cost, based on my experience, the price for Pega Robotic Process Automation is less than Blue Prism because I worked with a few clients that have both solutions and my clients prefer Pega Robotic Process Automation over Blue Prism particularly because of the licensing costs."

"Pega is pretty costly."

"Pega Robotic Process Automation is an expensive solution."

"I would rate the product's pricing a nine out of ten."

"​I was not involved in licensing and pricing, but it is worth the cost​."

"Pega is as competitive as the basic players such as UiPath or Automation Anywhere. UiPath is the most expensive, but Pega is at par with Automation Anywhere."