We performed a comparison between IntelliCorp LiveCompare and Jira based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Atlassian, Microsoft, Nutanix and others in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites."LiveCompare's Impact Analysis functionality identifies accurately what will be affected in production as the result of a change or an upgrade. It can also pinpoint accurately the scope of testing needed in anticipation of an upgrade."
"LiveCompare's unique reporting and advanced analytics streamline the entire migration process to SAP Hana, while minimizing costs, risk, and time."
"The ordinary user has an interface that is very clear."
"It is a good defect tracking tool. It has a lot of capabilities and functionalities. There are a lot of graphs and a lot of tracking. It can be sprint-driven if you want."
"The dynamic communication and the ability to customize it the way we want are the most valuable features."
"There are a lot of plugins in Jira and we purchase the ones we need."
"Reporting: It gives a nice report of my backlog and what my team has currently spent its efforts on."
"The most valuable feature of Jira is the reporting feature, which allows us to track our team's tasks."
"It's easy to escalate the issues to the product development team."
"The product is good, stable and very cost-effective for small teams."
"From my experience with the product, I would suggest adding a feature that would allow a customer who is reviewing the LiveCompare results to be able to connect remotely with one of IntelliCorp's experts (aside from their support) in order to assist the customer to better understand the results."
"I would like to see more integration available with more tools."
"We're doing PI planning, Program Increment planning, and that kind of stuff, and it's not always a good facilitator for that. We tend to pull it out and put it into other tools to manage that, and then we get it back into Jira as that's our system of record for where all the stories are kept. That's probably the biggest headache with it."
"Lacks some common building block approaches to certain things."
"There's been the odd amount of JIRA downtime (not self hosted) and sometimes tickets that can't be accessed."
"There is a difficulty viewing all the attachments because they are shown in one place. I would like attachments to be shown at the comment level."
"Of course, the price could always be cheaper."
"I think that there is some ease of use that could be brought in to improve certain things."
"Stability is an area of concern and it needs improvement, otherwise, it's a good product."
Earn 20 points
IntelliCorp LiveCompare is ranked 32nd in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites while Jira is ranked 1st in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites with 266 reviews. IntelliCorp LiveCompare is rated 0.0, while Jira is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of IntelliCorp LiveCompare writes "Accurately identifies what will be affected in production after a change or upgrade". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Jira writes "A great centralized tool that has a good agile framework and is useful for day-to-day planning, task management, and work log efficacy". IntelliCorp LiveCompare is most compared with , whereas Jira is most compared with Microsoft Azure DevOps, IBM Rational DOORS, OpenText ALM Octane, Rally Software and Polarion ALM.
See our list of best Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites vendors.
We monitor all Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.