We performed a comparison between Ivanti Neurons for RBVM and Tenable Vulnerability Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Tenable, Wiz, SentinelOne and others in Vulnerability Management."Most of the features are similar to what other tools have, but the UIs are quite user friendly. A beginner could use it."
"The vulnerability management itself is the most valuable feature as well as references to the mitigation techniques."
"There is no burden of updating or upgrading this solution."
"It is quite straightforward to set up."
"The solution is quite friendly."
"The solution provides seamlessness, a perfect UI, and identity management for office operations. We are most vulnerable to users. Therefore, it is crucial to implement the right solution to ensure proper user access and resource management."
"The initial setup is very straightforward."
"Tenable.io, in particular, is quite a powerful product. It looks at your traditional environment, which is pretty much anything that is on-premises, and it also goes a step ahead and covers your modern assets, which is anything that is currently sitting in the cloud. You get complete visibility of your entire environment and tech operation. The ability to give you visibility across the entire tech surface is one of the biggest advantages that Tenable.io has."
"The ease of use in terms of scanning assets is valuable."
"I would also like to see more integrations, plugins, and user-friendly automation, similar to the multiple integration scripts that Rapid7 has."
"Tenable could improve visibility into assets, including automated asset tagging. You should be able to automatically tag assets based on location, function, ownership, etc. That would help us because we spend a lot of time identifying and tagging assets by hand."
"It can have more integration."
"The solution is a bit slow."
"The tool's reports are bad. They're not very customizable or flexible. During audits, we often have to exclude things that aren't relevant to our organization, but we can't do that easily with the reports. They come in HTML or PDF format, and we can't compare current results with previous ones in Excel because we never receive reports in Excel."
"The product could be easier to set up on the cloud."
"The one drawback that we have found is the reports."
"The solution seems to focus too much on enterprises, and they really need a product that works for SMBs."
"I don't recommend Tenable.io Vulnerability Management for web scanning"
More Tenable Vulnerability Management Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
Ivanti Neurons for RBVM is ranked 45th in Vulnerability Management while Tenable Vulnerability Management is ranked 2nd in Vulnerability Management with 39 reviews. Ivanti Neurons for RBVM is rated 9.0, while Tenable Vulnerability Management is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Ivanti Neurons for RBVM writes "Useful for vulnerability management with many integrations". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tenable Vulnerability Management writes "Discovers vulnerabilities and integrates well with other solutions". Ivanti Neurons for RBVM is most compared with Qualys VMDR, Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM), Tenable Security Center and Rapid7 InsightVM, whereas Tenable Vulnerability Management is most compared with Tenable Security Center, Tenable Nessus, Qualys VMDR, Amazon Inspector and Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management.
See our list of best Vulnerability Management vendors.
We monitor all Vulnerability Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
